[EU] Champions League 2008/2009 (34 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
OP
Azzurri7

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #5,402
    Don't think bayern will get that far in the CL, once they face any of these teams (liverpool, barca or united) they'll likely to get knocked out....
    Their playing style is better than most of the teams remaining. They look better and tougher than Chelsea, Arsenal, Villareal, Porto. Liverpool - Bayern encounter would be nice to watch.
     

    Yamen

    Senior Member
    Apr 20, 2007
    11,809
    Just caught that news in the sun as well :)
    He will create so much hatred with ManU fans before coming to coach them "if it will even happen"
     

    Badass J Elkann

    It's time to go!!
    Feb 12, 2006
    69,068
    Inter had a very strong team when Mancini was fired and when Mourinho took over. At the summer Mourinho strenghtened the team even more (or he at least tried to) by spending +50m eur on Quaresma, Mancini, Obinna and Muntari (looking at how well and how much the first three play this season, that's 35m eur down the drain).

    The goal was the champions league of course. They didn't win it, and it's ok, only one of the many great european teams can win it afterall. But when you look at Mourinho's record in champions league with Inter you'll see that he was actually an embarrassment. He was second in his group behind Panathinaikos. He won two, drew three and lost three matches with a negative goal difference (7:8) and without scoring a goal on the last 4 matches, losing 3 of these 4 matches.

    In the league one can argue that the stronger serie A is a reason why he isn't better than Mancini was last year. It could be true, but i'll share the facts with you anyway.
    At this time last year, after 27 rounds, Inter had 64pts, 9 pts more than the 2nd placed Roma. This year they have 63pts, 7 more than the 2nd placed Juve.
    Even here Mourinho is worse than Mancini and there isn't an improvement.

    In the Coppa Mancini was always going all the way to the final and winning it sometimes, while Mourinho will have a hard time to get to the final after the 3:0 defeat from Sampdoria. No improvement again.

    In other words, The Special and highest earning coach in the world did shit for Inter and his only achievement so far worthy mentioning was introducing a primavera kid to the senior squad.
    Bravo, bravissimo Jose.
    well much could be said for jose stealing alot of the glory from ranieri's foundations that he built at chelsea too, in partcular securing cech.Joe cole and makelele again jose basically tried to improve it with trash like asshole cole,mikel, anelka,kalou,malouda etc... Im pretty certain that had ranieri been given more time with the new found fortunes, he would have won pretty much the same as mourinho did at chelsea, if not more
     

    sateeh

    Day Walker
    Jul 28, 2003
    8,020
    I'm glad we didn't get Mourinho.

    Capello mark II, but louder.
    exactly thats what i've been saying for a while. People were slating Capello so much but praising Mourinho.

    Both of them believe in the same theory of any solid team would create some chances and the key is about taking them. The difference is that Capello is a bit more old school with his defensive tactics.
    Inter had a very strong team when Mancini was fired and when Mourinho took over. At the summer Mourinho strenghtened the team even more (or he at least tried to) by spending +50m eur on Quaresma, Mancini, Obinna and Muntari (looking at how well and how much the first three play this season, that's 35m eur down the drain).

    The goal was the champions league of course. They didn't win it, and it's ok, only one of the many great european teams can win it afterall. But when you look at Mourinho's record in champions league with Inter you'll see that he was actually an embarrassment. He was second in his group behind Panathinaikos. He won two, drew three and lost three matches with a negative goal difference (7:8) and without scoring a goal on the last 4 matches, losing 3 of these 4 matches.

    In the league one can argue that the stronger serie A is a reason why he isn't better than Mancini was last year. It could be true, but i'll share the facts with you anyway.
    At this time last year, after 27 rounds, Inter had 64pts, 9 pts more than the 2nd placed Roma. This year they have 63pts, 7 more than the 2nd placed Juve.
    Even here Mourinho is worse than Mancini and there isn't an improvement.

    In the Coppa Mancini was always going all the way to the final and winning it sometimes, while Mourinho will have a hard time to get to the final after the 3:0 defeat from Sampdoria. No improvement again.

    In other words, The Special and highest earning coach in the world did shit for Inter and his only achievement so far worthy mentioning was introducing a primavera kid to the senior squad.
    Bravo, bravissimo Jose.
    Thank you Allen for the stats.

    The thing about Serie A for Jose, is that his little games would not work with the media and the multiple run ins with them proved that. In England, when he starts his mind games and media manipulation everyone "oohhs and ahhs" and " can he even said". While in Italy they would go, well thanks son but who are you going to play and why. After games he would scrutinized everywhere for his tactical weaknesses thus exposing it and he hates it. Also his status as a champions league winner at that time was regarded very highly in the EPL while in Italy they don't give two shits.

    Back to the champions, I suspect it will be another english team but I certainly hope someone else wins it or at least someone other than ManU.

    Bayern have a good cup coach in Klinsi but that 12-1 means nothing imo. They will need some luck with the draw if they are to reach further stages and then maybe there is a chance.

    Other than that i can't see other than Barca competing with the poms.
     

    Stephan

    Senior Member
    Nov 9, 2005
    16,647
    Inter had a very strong team when Mancini was fired and when Mourinho took over. At the summer Mourinho strenghtened the team even more (or he at least tried to) by spending +50m eur on Quaresma, Mancini, Obinna and Muntari (looking at how well and how much the first three play this season, that's 35m eur down the drain).

    The goal was the champions league of course. They didn't win it, and it's ok, only one of the many great european teams can win it afterall. But when you look at Mourinho's record in champions league with Inter you'll see that he was actually an embarrassment. He was second in his group behind Panathinaikos. He won two, drew three and lost three matches with a negative goal difference (7:8) and without scoring a goal on the last 4 matches, losing 3 of these 4 matches.

    In the league one can argue that the stronger serie A is a reason why he isn't better than Mancini was last year. It could be true, but i'll share the facts with you anyway.
    At this time last year, after 27 rounds, Inter had 64pts, 9 pts more than the 2nd placed Roma. This year they have 63pts, 7 more than the 2nd placed Juve.
    Even here Mourinho is worse than Mancini and there isn't an improvement.

    In the Coppa Mancini was always going all the way to the final and winning it sometimes, while Mourinho will have a hard time to get to the final after the 3:0 defeat from Sampdoria. No improvement again.

    In other words, The Special and highest earning coach in the world did shit for Inter and his only achievement so far worthy mentioning was introducing a primavera kid to the senior squad.
    Bravo, bravissimo Jose.
    they bought the wrong players to start with. If you watch manu-inter its quite obvious how far inter really are, and theres no way one could put them as one of the cl likely winners.

    I cant understand how a team like inter, back-to-back champs, can have so many old has been players and not bring in any new ones. You dont win CL with these figos and vieiras. I guess the money must be going somewhere else. :shifty:
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    54,028
    they bought the wrong players to start with.
    Well yeah, now it definitely looks like that. I thought so too tbh even during the summer but it was still open for debate back then. The flat 4-4-2 didn't work for Mancini and the 4-3-3 with 2 wide attackers was the main change that should've made Inter more cometetive in the Champions league, where you need more creativity and you can't win if you bully the other teams with sheer power as it's the case with Inter in serie A.
    If you noticed, the 4-3-3 with Mancini and Quaresma in attack next to Zlatan was what Mourinho stubbornly kept using in the CL group stages, even though it was obvious that it doesn't bring results. He knew that it's the only way to change something to better after the failures of the previous years, and he hoped that it will click one day. Unfortunately for him it didn't. It was finally clear that 4-3-3 (at least with the attacking wingers at his disposal) is even worse than the 4-4-2 or the 4-3-1-2 with Stankovic as the AMC.
     

    Hust

    Senior Member
    Hustini
    May 29, 2005
    93,703
    It has already backfired if you ask me. Alen's eloquent post on the last page says it all. Now he is being investigated for punching a fan...plus got eliminated so early in CL. I would like to see Moratti the Grinch's face right now
     

    Badass J Elkann

    It's time to go!!
    Feb 12, 2006
    69,068
    Roberto Mancini must be loving this :lol:

    Frankly speaking Mourinho = All talk, no action

    i fail to see what is so special about a man who only shows a blatent lack of respect for his enemies. In england you can get away with that, because they dont know the meaning of respect, but in italy there is that line of respect between the managers.
     

    king Ale

    Senior Member
    Oct 28, 2004
    21,689
    Amazing Red,I live in Manchester but I'am a season ticket holder at Arsenal makes sense to me,I said I was a season ticket holder at Manchester City not Arsenal, yes I do have a soft spot for Arsenal because they play the game how its supposed to be played,fluent attacking football but it seems I'am not aloud to 'like' two teams,irnonic from your position ey mate?.
    So juve is the last team you should support.
     

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    Sep 23, 2003
    84,799
    It's Mourinho's first year in Italy. I think it would be rather foolish to discount him just yet. Might even backfire in the end.
    I'm with Andy here. I would so much rather have Mourinho than Ranieri as our coach. That's not even a question.

    It has already backfired if you ask me. Alen's eloquent post on the last page says it all. Now he is being investigated for punching a fan...plus got eliminated so early in CL. I would like to see Moratti the Grinch's face right now
    The CL can do anything. I mean, Capello was just one heads-up goal, on a flubbed ball from Emerson, away from going down to Werder Bremen at home in the first elimination round.

    And crap, if you're going to complain about going down in the first knockout round, going against the reigning champions, and the favorites to win again this year, is hardly a disgrace.

    While we'd all like to gloat over Inter's failures, I think this is a bit misplaced in making more out of very little that's there yet.
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    54,028
    Galliani: The reason why the English teams are above the Italians are of economic nature. Thanks, most of all, to the fact that the English teams own their stadiums, the net profit they get per year is much superior to ours. If we don't have our own stadiums, we won't be able to compete with the English.
    http://www.gazzetta.it/Calcio/SerieA/Squadre/Milan/Primo_Piano/2009/03/12/Galliani.shtml

    Yes, the so much criticized stadium project. Now someone who is much more familiar with these things than i am and all of you here are, confirms how big the importance of our new stadium will be.

    P.S: Galliani then continued with bragging how Milan were the last team who won against Manchester in CL :lol:
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 34)