[EU] Champions League 2007/2008 (25 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
Except he didn't get outcoached tonight. His team dominated the first 20 minutes and got the goal they were looking for and Liverpool only asserted themselves when Arsenal lost the key to their midfield, Flamini.

When Pool went 2-1 up Wenger reacted by bringing on Walcott and Van Persie and those changes were pivotal. Arsenal would be in the semifinals right now if not for Toure.
Outcoached by Toure, you could say.. :D
 

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
No they could've had the game under control, but gave it away. 4 goals conceded in a CL game, you just won't win it if you let things like that happen.
Liverpool only scored 1goal from an open play....the 2nd one(Torres)

They conceded first goal from a corner kick, it's pretty hard to keep the game under control when you're playing away and specially when you're playing in CL where each goals counts.

IMO, he could have approached the game in a diff way at the start of the 2nd half, but I don't see any mistake he did from tactical point in the 1st half.
 

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
Liverpool's first goal came from a set piece, no coach could have prevented the second goal, and the third goal was a penalty. The fourth goal is irrelevant because at that stage Arsenal had to throw caution to the wind. Hardly Wenger's fault.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
After this match i have come to one conclusion:

Fuck the ref, the cheating cunt, the fucker robbed us, and now i dont wish for him to die, but i'd really like it if his whole fuckin family got murdered, so he'll fucking know how we arsenal fans feel..Cunt!!!
 

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
After this match i have come to one conclusion:

Fuck the ref, the cheating cunt, the fucker robbed us, and now i dont wish for him to die, but i'd really like it if his whole fuckin family got murdered, so he'll fucking know how we arsenal fans feel..Cunt!!!
I'm assuming you don't think it was a penalty.. :D
 

Dominic

Senior Member
Jan 30, 2004
16,706
Except he didn't get outcoached tonight. His team dominated the first 20 minutes and got the goal they were looking for and Liverpool only asserted themselves when Arsenal lost the key to their midfield, Flamini.

When Pool went 2-1 up Wenger reacted by bringing on Walcott and Van Persie and those changes were pivotal. Arsenal would be in the semifinals right now if not for Toure.
The Flamini thing was more coincedental than crucial. Arsenal gave their all the first 20 minutes, which had obvious repurcussions in the second half. They self-destructed and were dead-tired, Fabregas for example was completely exhausted in the second half. It allowed Liverpool back in the game, who were more conservative and controlled with their energy and pounced when it counted.

But yes, Toure's moment was crucial.


Liverpool only scored 1goal from an open play....the 2nd one(Torres)

They conceded first goal from a corner kick, it's pretty hard to keep the game under control when you're playing away and specially when you're playing in CL where each goals counts.

IMO, he could have approached the game in a diff way at the start of the 2nd half, but I don't see any mistake he did from tactical point in the 1st half.
Well you hit the nail on the head in your last paragraph...
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
I'm assuming you don't think it was a penalty.. :D
That would be a safe assumption,yes.

The Flamini thing was more coincedental than crucial. Arsenal gave their all the first 20 minutes, which had obvious repurcussions in the second half. They self-destructed and were dead-tired, Fabregas for example was completely exhausted in the second half. It allowed Liverpool back in the game, who were more conservative and controlled with their energy and pounced when it counted.
thats not true at all, it was obvious we missed Flamini, we lost the midfield as soon as he went out. The same things been happening all season when Flamini doesnt play.
 

Stu

Senior Member
Jul 14, 2002
17,557
The Flamini thing was more coincedental than crucial. Arsenal gave their all the first 20 minutes, which had obvious repurcussions in the second half. They self-destructed and were dead-tired, Fabregas for example was completely exhausted in the second half. It allowed Liverpool back in the game, who were more conservative and controlled with their energy and pounced when it counted.

But yes, Toure's moment was crucial.
How was it more coincidental than crucial? Flamini is arguably Arsenal's fittest player and hardest worker. His absence allowed Liverpool to control the midfield in the second half. Yes Fabregas was tired but not just because of his exertion in the first half. It was because he had Mascherano up his ass and Arsenal didn't have Flamini to do the same to Gerrard. I'm confident they wouldn't have been overrun like they were if Flamini was on the field.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 25)