Your argument makes no sense. You say Eto'o isn't half as good as David, but then go on to say Samuel is the better all around player. So what, are we counting finishing twice as much the amount of everything else a forward should do?
It's strange you haven't even checked the stats. Eto'o actually has a higher strike rate than David. But I suppose that doesn't matter. So what are we basing this rating on?
I say Eto isnt half as good as Trezeguet in terms of
finishing.Eto is a more complete player than Trezeguet,but as far as finishing is concerned,Trezeguet is miles ahead of him.Eto is not as good a finisher as people make him out to be,and this is what im rating him on.Eto has a higher strikerate than Trezeguet because of the midfield that backs him up.A player in Eto's position will get countless chances because of the creativity that backs him up in midfield.Trezeguet on the other hand,does not have the luxury of so much creativity.The goal scoring chances that he gets are less than the ones Eto gets.This is the what ive been saying for the last 2 pages.Put someone like Trezeguet or RVN with Barcelona's midfield,and they'd score more goals than Eto has.Both of them are much better finishers than Eto.I Repeat,
FINISHERS.
you talk about stats,lets have stats :
Eto at Mallorca had 54 goals in 134 matches
Eto for the Cameroon NT has 19 goals in 64 matches.
Eto at Barcelona has 76 goals in 107 matches(Till Jan 2008)
Trezeguet at Monaco had 52 goals in 93 matches.
Trezeguet for the French NT has 34 goals in 74 matches.
Trezeguet for Juve has 126 goals in 210 matches(Till Jan 2008)
The only time Eto's had a better strike rate than Trezeguet was at Barcelona,because of the creaitivty that backed him up in midfield...and even there the difference between the 2 isnt huge.David has probably done much better because he's had to live off an uncreative midfield,unlike Eto.Trezeguet's career strikerate pawns Eto's.
What stats are you talking about now?