EPL Sues YouTube (1 Viewer)

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,871
#1
The English Premier League is to sue video-sharing site YouTube for alleged copyright infringement.

The football organisation said YouTube had "knowingly misappropriated" its intellectual property by encouraging footage to be viewed on its site.

Google-owned YouTube already faces a $1bn (£501m) lawsuit from media giant Viacom, accusing it of illegally showing clips from its TV shows.

YouTube has denied those claims, saying the suit threatens the internet.

The English Premier League and US music publisher Bourne launched the legal action in New York, claiming unspecified damages.

They said YouTube had consciously encouraged people to view content on its site in order to raise its profile, violating the material's commercial value.

"Defendants which own and operate YouTube have knowingly misappropriated and exploited this valuable property for their own gain without payment or licence to the owners of the intellectual property," the lawsuit said.

The commercial value of the Premier League has risen spectacularly in recent years, making protection of its rights a priority for the organisation.

The combined TV, radio and internet rights to show live games and highlights over the next three years fetched £2.7bn in a series of auctions.

Despite its huge popularity and commercial success, YouTube has attracted criticism from media organisations for the access it provides to sought-after content.

Viacom, which owns MTV and Nickelodeon, claimed that 160,000 unauthorised clips of TV shows had been viewed more than 1.5 billion times.

One internet expert said YouTube was coming under increasing pressure over the issue of copyright and he expected it to eventually settle with its various plaintiffs.

"There is absolutely no doubt that an awful lot of content is in breach of copyright," said media consultant Bob Eggington.

BBC
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#7
I wouldn't be the least bit worried. Everyone knows there's a ton of copyrighted material on youtube, google sure knew that when they bought the site. Everyone held their lawsuits because youtube was a startup and had no money. Obviously google knew what they were getting into, a company with deep pockets would immediately get sued from all those desperate for money.

I think it's a challenge for them to operate youtube. They've already had to implement screening of content, for instance you won't find clips from the Daily Show anymore, and what will probably happen with the EPL thing is they remove those as well.
 

Ahmedios

Senior Member
Nov 11, 2006
5,107
#8
The exclusive owners of the copyright of the EPL have the right to sue Youtube. But, they've ignored that Youtube share in the popularity of the EPL. This popularity maybe affected when the number of the fans, who usually don't follow the EPL on TV nor radio, decrease worldwide.
 

AngelaL

Jinx Minx
Aug 25, 2006
10,215
#9
We ought to sue the EPL.
Looks like the EPL are rooked* and are incapable of financially sustaining themselves. That's why the EPL and the English clubs are starting to sue anyone they think they can screw money out of.

* rooked = slang meaning desperately short of cash (or broke).
 

3pac

Alex Del Mexico
May 7, 2004
7,206
#13
Oh, I misunderstood. I thought everyone was saying Google had started youtube and then sold it, meanwhile creating google video.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#14
Oh, I misunderstood. I thought everyone was saying Google had started youtube and then sold it, meanwhile creating google video.
No, but that's close to being the exact opposite of what happened. In bizzarro world you'd be right on the money.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,810
#16
YouTube is largely popular because it's done for video what Napster first did for music. Most of the stuff there is illegal. And if it gets its ass shut down(which it won't), I would honestly say it deserved it.

They're really just making their own popularity off the backs of people who are having the content they own by enabling it to be copied and distributed without their permission.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)