[ENG] Premiership 2012/2013 (6 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Maddy

Oracle of Copenhagen
Jul 10, 2009
16,545
less about timeline and more about adhering to the technical definition of the term as opposed to the current cultural uses. You are not going to use 'pleb' in uni paper as a pejorative term unless it's an anthropology project on hipsters
enough geek talk
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,882
less about timeline and more about adhering to the technical definition of the term as opposed to the current cultural uses. You are not going to use 'pleb' in uni paper as a pejorative term unless it's an anthropology project on hipsters
No, I'm not going to use it in a derogatory term in a uni paper. It might be because I've been brainwashed during my studies, but whenever someone uses a term today I always put it in historical and timeline context. That should adequately explain my point about the timeline, those people who were plebs might well become bourgeois, but they can not be bourgeois plebs, the two terms together form up an oxymoron.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,023
Interesting game that, if a little odd.

Newcastle managed to fall into the standard trap for a team that chooses to play 4-5-1 when it isn't their normal formation.

They got it into their head that it was a defensive move (which it was, to some extent, at least), so were far too passive and completely failed to impose themselves on the game in the first half.

The three in Newcastles midfield also seemed to feel that, because they had one more player in there than normal, that none of them needed to take any responsibility to do anything useful - like make tackles or passes.

The change to 4-4-2 changed their mentality, as much as anything.

Suddenly they went onto the front foot and took control of the game. Going two up front gave the option to play longer, which is what Newcastle are best at, but Everton failed to win as many second balls as they should given that they then had the extra man in midfield.

Pain in the arse that Everton's 'gol di Anichebe' wasn't given, since I'll now have to listen to at least a week of mind-numbing comments about the need for goal-line technology.
 

YasoR17

Mirkofan #1
Jul 4, 2008
7,751
Fox started a co-production with Liverpool itself to do a season-long, semi-documentary (with some insider bias). Check it out -- it's on network TV and the first episode aired yesterday afternoon. It basically starts from May 2012 and the FA Cup loss, new coach, etc.

http://msn.foxsports.com/foxsoccer/event/being-liverpool
Saw some bits of the first episode on TV here yesterday. Looked interesting. Saw the part with Borini's medical, when he said he had trouble sleeping during the Euros :D
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,619
No, I'm not going to use it in a derogatory term in a uni paper. It might be because I've been brainwashed during my studies, but whenever someone uses a term today I always put it in historical and timeline context. That should adequately explain my point about the timeline, those people who were plebs might well become bourgeois, but they can not be bourgeois plebs, the two terms together form up an oxymoron.
Maybe that's why he did it. To indirectly call you a oxymoron. Puzzle solved. Good job, Madvillain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 4)