[ENG] Premiership 2010/2011 (13 Viewers)

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
Wengers invincible is the team I mentioned they were very dirty when they neededto be and hence they won, not always enjoyable but effective and that's all that matters.


Fred I'll re-civilise things just by summarising.

Teams like Stoke Blackburn et al that use such tactics have every right to do so. They are not a disgrace and they enrich football by forcing team to actually dig deep and have a go.
 

Fred

Senior Member
Oct 2, 2003
41,112
Wengers invincible is the team I mentioned they were very dirty when they neededto be and hence they won, not always enjoyable but effective and that's all that matters.


Fred I'll re-civilise things just by summarising.

Teams like Stoke Blackburn et al that use such tactics have every right to do so. They are not a disgrace and they enrich football but forcing team to actually dig deep and have a go.

Thats why i said you don't know how to read. I said that they have a right to play that way millions of times. I still think the way they choose to play is a disgrace to the beautiful game.

Wengers invincible team was nicer to watch than the current team, without a doubt, we destroyed teams by fast counterattacking one touch football. We don't do that anymore. But ya, we had some dirty tacklers in there, still our play did not center on roughing teams up and fluke throw ins.
 

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
Fred, calling something a disgrace to football is implicitly labeling it an anthithesis to the game.

You can't call an action a disgrace and antifootbapl
and then champion their right. It's not that you didn't say booth it's that is a contradiction.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 8)