Edin Džeko - Striker - Manchester City - Part 2 (16 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
May 22, 2007
37,256
But we have a limit, they dont, they can always offer more.

---------- Post added 22.05.2012 at 22:28 ----------



I think the stadium has payed itself off through the naming rights, for whihc we received 120 mil e (unless we spent it already :D )
ehh, something like €75m more like.

I remember an article that said we'd receive 6.25 billion a year from Sportfive. :D
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

juve901

The Strategist
Jul 8, 2008
300
This is going to take some time before every penny that they make will actually be able to be re-invested in the club.
There will never be a time where every penny earned can be re-invested into the club. Clubs will always have debts, and clubs lose more money than they make. Provincial clubs are the only ones that try to square off every quarter or year. But the big clubs, the major clubs, the Championship clubs, always lose money - but that's why there owners are densely rich. Juve doesn't have to be a Real Madrid, or a Barca, or Man City... but they can be a club that can buy a 35-50m Champion player once every 3-5 years.
 

fredrik

Senior Member
Aug 7, 2011
7,239
dzeko currently makes more than buffon, who is the highest earner at juve. it doesnt feel right in my mind to pay dzeko more than him. if he takes a paycut to come here, i would welcome him
 
Mar 30, 2006
3,747
I think for the money Tevez would have a much bigger impact on our attack then Dzeko. And Milan almost signed him last winter so if they could have a chance I think we could realistically get him. I dont see us signing either Higuain or Cavani. Tevez would be good in conte's system and could play a central forward role or play along side Matri or Vucinic in the 3-5-2. Also I feel as though he is a sure thing interms of scoring while I am not sure how Dzeko would do. Tevez would be more involved in build up play as well. I would be much more optimistic with a team with Tevez upfront then with Dzeko upfront (not that i dont think Dzeko is a good player)
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
o boy, the salary is a deal breaker!
Only an EPL team can afford that, or a Spanish one if they are still not paying taxes.
For us, with taxes doubling everything, its out of the question, even if he accepts a 50% cut...
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
o boy, the salary is a deal breaker!
Only an EPL team can afford that, or a Spanish one if they are still not paying taxes.
For us, with taxes doubling everything, its out of the question, even if he accepts a 50% cut...
 
Mar 30, 2006
3,747
We have to offer players competitive salaries with other top clubs. I dont think Buffon would mind if a player was earning more then him, as long as it makes the team competitive. If you asked Gigi if he wanted a top striker at the club who earns a top salary or if he wants us to keep signing Boriello level players for our attack what do u guys think he would pick? No player will join Juventus and take a big salary cut. if u could make a 150 000 a week would u join a team that offered u 70 000?
Maybe if they were not playing and making 150 000 and we offered 110 000 and a starting spot they MIGHT take it.. but who knows. Either way we will have to spend. We can't get players in high demand like RVP who is being offered crazy money by City ... so we should go for players who have just as much quality but might not be in such high demand, such as Tevez (cuz he is a mutinous) or Suarez (cuz he is Racist). Those are players we may just have a shot at signing. Same goes for Dzeko and Balotelli.
 
Sep 2, 2004
3,115
Dzeko is probably the only striker out of all names that Juve has been linked with that has a big chance to happen. Cavani and Higuain are not affordable.

Dzeko
Money + Giovinco to Napoli for Lavezzi and we're set.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
The salary makes him unrealistic though.
Neither a transfer fee can be reached imo.
He is not more realistic, just more available and there is a certain reason for that...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 14)