Downtimes (7 Viewers)

Marty

Marty

tuz
Administrator
#645
Jul 2, 2005
16,991
#645
Yeah been running a bit patchy the past few days, had a few DDoS attacks (mostly during evenings/nights) several days in a row as well as hacking attempts. Hopefully we'll see the end of it soon.
 
Albo

Albo

Senior Member
#650
Apr 13, 2009
11,463
#650
Marty said:
Yeah been running a bit patchy the past few days, had a few DDoS attacks (mostly during evenings/nights) several days in a row as well as hacking attempts. Hopefully we'll see the end of it soon.
Click to expand...
www.MediaTemple.net is awesome why don't host there website , they have amazing servers with great firewalls .

------------------------------------

And who the f*** is Abejaa ??!! // Sounds like Albanian nickname .
 
Martin

Martin

Senior Member
#653
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#653
swag said:
PHP will work nicely on a distributed cloud. But the back-end database is another story. Probably have to wait for vBulletin v7 for that. :p
Click to expand...
Oh please, juventuz still is a tiny database by database scaling standards. How big could it be, 2gb? 4gb? That's nothing, I talked to a guy last week who's running a 1.5tb database on a single server.
 
swag

swag

L'autista
Administrator
#655
Sep 23, 2003
84,788
#655
Martin said:
Oh please, juventuz still is a tiny database by database scaling standards. How big could it be, 2gb? 4gb? That's nothing, I talked to a guy last week who's running a 1.5tb database on a single server.
Click to expand...
It's not about the size of your database, it's how you use it. :oops:

No, seriously -- sharding or doing some other distributed database solution is really an option you don't want to pull in an EC2 environment. It could all go back to a single datastore, however, which sounds like the most reasonable option. No synchronization concerns allowed, etc.
 
Martin

Martin

Senior Member
#656
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#656
swag said:
It's not about the size of your database, it's how you use it. :oops:

No, seriously -- sharding or doing some other distributed database solution is really an option you don't want to pull in an EC2 environment. It could all go back to a single datastore, however, which sounds like the most reasonable option. No synchronization concerns allowed, etc.
Click to expand...
Dude what are you even talking about? What is the issue at hand?
 
Martin

Martin

Senior Member
#658
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#658
swag said:
Distributed cloud environments basically have an impedance mismatch of sorts when they connect to things like data stores.
Click to expand...
Yes. And nice use of buzzword.

But even in cloud environments I'm pretty sure you can get a big server if you can't distribute your data. Guy I mentioned had 800gb in a sql server machine. Other guy had 1.5tb in an oracle machine. So maybe it would be tough for them to move this to a cloud, but Juventuz?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 7)