another? Yeah I think that we could do much better then Ranieri, he is a ok coach but nothing more, or do you think he is the best for us?
As a club we must always look at ways to be better, right now a new manager is one of them. I choose Prandelli as my choice beacuse he is italian so he know the italian football, he is young coach and he is not afraid to give young players a chance, the teams he have trained have played a good fotball with him.
He deserves a chance to coach a big team like Juventus, and plus he is a former Juventus player so he suits us well?
Im open for other alternatives ofcourse, but I do think we could do much better then Ranieri, don´t you and your friend Jack think so?
So far all we know about Prandelli is that he's doing ok with teams that aren't scudetto contenders.
I won't count his beginnings as a coach with the smaller teams because there were no noticable results so i'll count Parma and Fiorentina.
Parma was a team that was quality wise behind the big teams (Lazio was a great team back then) and in front of all the other serie A teams, and Prandelli managed to take Parma to the 5th spot in two consecutive years.
With Fiorentina he wins the 4th place consistently. That's a very good result, but still, quality wise Fiorentina is the 4th or 5th team in Italy, so it's not some super remarkable result.
Some may say that he took Fiorentina from the very bottom and made a very good team out of them. That's true, but one mustn't forget that after Juve, Milan and Inter, Fiorentina is actually the highest spender and the 4th richest team in the country, or 5th richest (i guess they are on par with Roma). You can say that their results are equal to the money they spend.
So yes, he's making the expected results, or a little more than expected....but that's it.
Could he be better than Ranieri? He could and maybe he couldn't. We have absolutely nothing to make a comparison. He's 51 and has 16 years of coaching career, but he was never given a chance to lead a big team.
People say that they want Ranieri out because he never won smthg and then they say they want Prandelli. I don't see the logic in this. You could say that it can't be worse than Ranieri and then i will accept if you want Prandelli. But you guys say you want a winner and then you say how you want a coach who never won anything and who was never given a chance to win anything (perhaps there is a good reason why no big team hired him? )