Danilo - RB - Real Madrid (3 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dujj

Junior Member
Jun 4, 2017
433
PSG is also on Danilo too now.

Henrique is set to meet Real officials this week, so don't expect any done deal with Danilo before that. Real probably wants to hear PSG's offer first.

(Don't shoot the messenger lol)
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Gigiventus

Senior Member
Mar 3, 2017
3,276
He was great at Porto. Mostly known for his attacking than his defending.

Then he moved to Madrid and became hilariously bad. Completely exposed and incapable of defending. The contrast between Carvajal and him is huge.
 

Dujj

Junior Member
Jun 4, 2017
433
PSG get Danilo, we get their troublesome deadwood Aurier.
IMHO, Henrique is trolling the mercato game by bidding on almost every players, so it raises fees for everyone.

That's just my personal opinion tho.

Let's see if this gets more response, how was he at Porto?
He was awesome at Porto. To the point that when Madrid bought him, it became a world record fee for an RB.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Makes 0 for Chelsea, a club that apparently can trow 100 mil at two fullbacks before wages, that they'd get a prime worldclass player, and a massive Madrid reject who failed


Sure. Danilo has insane potential. But why bother if you can just spend premium ?
 

X Æ A-12

Senior Member
Contributor
Sep 4, 2006
87,934
Makes 0 for Chelsea, a club that apparently can trow 100 mil at two fullbacks before wages, that they'd get a prime worldclass player, and a massive Madrid reject who failed


Sure. Danilo has insane potential. But why bother if you can just spend premium ?
shortage of available top fullbacks?
 

spurdo

Senior Member
Jun 4, 2016
1,917
When Aurier has a bad game, he's really bad. Nonchalant, misplace passes, poor decision making. He's talented and can be impressive, but I'd avoid especially given he's a cancer off field
You're describing Danilo there perfectly, except he's had bad seasons instead (granted, not a total cunt like Aurier lol)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)