The cryptosexuals are a demented bunch so you can't rationalise they behaviour. The crypto fantasy will grow more before the inevitable implosion.
We need at least 21 000 "unique" and with "limited" supply crypto "currencies" . The now existing more than 7000 Bitcoin forks are just not enough to devour the money of the hundreds of millions morons with IQ of 70 and lower. LOL.
Изпратено от моят XQ-AU52 с помощта на Tapatalk

Nice.
You think whole cryptocurrency is based on hype and we'll just have to disagree because our views are here entirely different.
Well, with stawks the underlying asset roughly follows value growth in a business. With crypto, it's deliberately capped as a closed system... like closed-end fund. That's not its bug: that's its feature.
Sure, that helps cover it from some central bank inflation abuses in theory. But the only way you build more value in the system is through the mechanics of what's commonly known as a pyramid scheme: someone has to pay out for the same asset more than you put into it to buy it. The underlying asset is fixed.
So no, it's not an investment per se anymore than buying rocks is an investment.
It's built on internet lore, which can easily be infiltrated and hijacked. Also what good is it if you pay taxes on it and it can be traced (you only allowed to trade after providing tax id). I think the crypto idea at first was good, internet was also a much freer environment back then. Right now i think it's just a way for betas to stick it to the system, except this will only make them money if it gets hijacked by the system, case in point doge.
And A touches on the thing here. In the early days of the innocent Internet, people believed that you could empower the individual and flip the middle finger to powerful forces who controlled communication channel access: the media, publications, global message reach. The Internet was going to be an egalitarian wonderland that subverted the old power structure. Well guess what?
Facebook proved: meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Yes, the voices are out there, but money and influence have clearly found a way to keep up and tilt the tables heavily in their favor.
Similarly with the cult zombies who see crypto as societal salvation. They seem to think they can escape society and its governments, its command of physical assets, its inequalities where the rich get richer and the little guy gets screwed out. With institutional investors stepping in, they are either going to hijack the system and bend it to their favor ... or try to sabotage it from within altogether.
But it is cute when people think they can "stick it to the man" with their glorious collection of bits.