It just says evidence not lost so I'm guessing it's whatever they had back when the allegations were made previously
Buy on AliExpress.com
Buy on AliExpress.com
Or maybe Real Madrid is pretty much got this one with their pants around their ankles...
https://www.calciomercato.com/en/ne...-forced-ronaldo-to-pay-alleged-rape-vic-53242
From Portugal: Real Madrid forced Ronaldo to pay alleged rape victim
10 October at 13:25
Another twist to an already complicated case of rape accusations related to Juventus star Cristiano Ronaldo. Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manha brought new information regarding the issue after countless circulating rumours.
According to the paper, Cristiano Ronaldo signed the agreement with Kathryn Mayorga in 2010, pledging to pay compensation to the woman, under pressure from Real Madrid.
...
https://www.calciomercato.com/en/ne...-forced-ronaldo-to-pay-alleged-rape-vic-53242
From Portugal: Real Madrid forced Ronaldo to pay alleged rape victim
10 October at 13:25
Another twist to an already complicated case of rape accusations related to Juventus star Cristiano Ronaldo. Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manha brought new information regarding the issue after countless circulating rumours.
According to the paper, Cristiano Ronaldo signed the agreement with Kathryn Mayorga in 2010, pledging to pay compensation to the woman, under pressure from Real Madrid.
...
Or maybe Real Madrid is pretty much got this one with their pants around their ankles...
https://www.calciomercato.com/en/ne...-forced-ronaldo-to-pay-alleged-rape-vic-53242
From Portugal: Real Madrid forced Ronaldo to pay alleged rape victim
10 October at 13:25
Another twist to an already complicated case of rape accusations related to Juventus star Cristiano Ronaldo. Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manha brought new information regarding the issue after countless circulating rumours.
According to the paper, Cristiano Ronaldo signed the agreement with Kathryn Mayorga in 2010, pledging to pay compensation to the woman, under pressure from Real Madrid.
...
https://www.calciomercato.com/en/ne...-forced-ronaldo-to-pay-alleged-rape-vic-53242
From Portugal: Real Madrid forced Ronaldo to pay alleged rape victim
10 October at 13:25
Another twist to an already complicated case of rape accusations related to Juventus star Cristiano Ronaldo. Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manha brought new information regarding the issue after countless circulating rumours.
According to the paper, Cristiano Ronaldo signed the agreement with Kathryn Mayorga in 2010, pledging to pay compensation to the woman, under pressure from Real Madrid.
...
Still rumors though, as is pretty much everything else in the press around Topher and Vivian Ward...
Or maybe Real Madrid is pretty much got this one with their pants around their ankles...
https://www.calciomercato.com/en/ne...-forced-ronaldo-to-pay-alleged-rape-vic-53242
From Portugal: Real Madrid forced Ronaldo to pay alleged rape victim
10 October at 13:25
Another twist to an already complicated case of rape accusations related to Juventus star Cristiano Ronaldo. Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manha brought new information regarding the issue after countless circulating rumours.
According to the paper, Cristiano Ronaldo signed the agreement with Kathryn Mayorga in 2010, pledging to pay compensation to the woman, under pressure from Real Madrid.
...
https://www.calciomercato.com/en/ne...-forced-ronaldo-to-pay-alleged-rape-vic-53242
From Portugal: Real Madrid forced Ronaldo to pay alleged rape victim
10 October at 13:25
Another twist to an already complicated case of rape accusations related to Juventus star Cristiano Ronaldo. Portuguese newspaper Correio da Manha brought new information regarding the issue after countless circulating rumours.
According to the paper, Cristiano Ronaldo signed the agreement with Kathryn Mayorga in 2010, pledging to pay compensation to the woman, under pressure from Real Madrid.
...
I had a feeling that they were behind it.
My dream now is that all of this dies down in a legal sense (which it should), but that the public opinion of Ronaldo remains very tainted, and that he scores the winning goal in the UCL final in Madrid to end our European Cup trophy drought to the sound of massive booing by the do-gooder crowds and the social justice brigade. Netting us yet another "unpopular" CL trophy, just like the one we lifted in 1985.
AMICI DI NESSUNO
AMICI DI NESSUNO
Peter S. Christiansen, lawyer for Cristiano Ronaldo, issued the following statement:
"I was hired to represent Cristiano Ronaldo following a recent civil action based on events alleged to have occurred in 2009, culminating in the conclusion of an agreement whereby the parties waived all other rights. Mindful of the breach of this agreement by the other party, as well as the inflamed accusations that followed on the following days, Cristiano Ronaldo is forced to break the silence, being certain that this agreement authorizes a "proportional reaction" to him in case of violation by the counterparty.
So that there are no doubts: Cristiano Ronaldo vehemently denies all the accusations in this civil action, in consistency with what he has done in the last 9 years.
The documents that allegedly contain statements by Mr. Ronaldo and were reproduced in the media are pure inventions.
By 2015, dozens of entities (including law firms) in different parts of Europe were attacked and their electronic data stolen by a cyber criminal.
This hacker tried to sell such information, and a media outlet irresponsibly ended up publishing some of the stolen documents, significant parts of which were altered and / or completely fabricated. Once again, for the avoidance of doubt, Cristiano Ronaldo's position has always been, and continues to be, that what happened in 2009 in Las Vegas was completely consensual.
Cristiano Ronaldo does not deny that he agreed to enter into an agreement, but the reasons that led him to do so are at least to be distorted. This agreement is by no means a confession of guilt. What happened was simply that Cristiano Ronaldo merely followed the advice of his advisors in order to put an end to the outrageous accusations made against him, in order precisely to avoid attempts, such as those we are now witnessing, to destroy a reputation built thanks to hard work, athletic ability and behavioral correction. Unfortunately, it is now involved in the type of litigation that is very common in the United States.
Although Cristiano Ronaldo is accustomed to media attention, inherent in the fact that he is a famous person, it is absolutely deplorable that the media continue to propagate and stimulate an intentional defamation campaign based on stolen and easily manipulated digital documents.
Cristiano Ronaldo has mandated his lawyers in the United States and Europe to deal with all legal aspects and expresses full confidence that the truth will prevail, despite the corruption of counterinformation, and in which the laws of Nevada will be enforced and respected.
"I was hired to represent Cristiano Ronaldo following a recent civil action based on events alleged to have occurred in 2009, culminating in the conclusion of an agreement whereby the parties waived all other rights. Mindful of the breach of this agreement by the other party, as well as the inflamed accusations that followed on the following days, Cristiano Ronaldo is forced to break the silence, being certain that this agreement authorizes a "proportional reaction" to him in case of violation by the counterparty.
So that there are no doubts: Cristiano Ronaldo vehemently denies all the accusations in this civil action, in consistency with what he has done in the last 9 years.
The documents that allegedly contain statements by Mr. Ronaldo and were reproduced in the media are pure inventions.
By 2015, dozens of entities (including law firms) in different parts of Europe were attacked and their electronic data stolen by a cyber criminal.
This hacker tried to sell such information, and a media outlet irresponsibly ended up publishing some of the stolen documents, significant parts of which were altered and / or completely fabricated. Once again, for the avoidance of doubt, Cristiano Ronaldo's position has always been, and continues to be, that what happened in 2009 in Las Vegas was completely consensual.
Cristiano Ronaldo does not deny that he agreed to enter into an agreement, but the reasons that led him to do so are at least to be distorted. This agreement is by no means a confession of guilt. What happened was simply that Cristiano Ronaldo merely followed the advice of his advisors in order to put an end to the outrageous accusations made against him, in order precisely to avoid attempts, such as those we are now witnessing, to destroy a reputation built thanks to hard work, athletic ability and behavioral correction. Unfortunately, it is now involved in the type of litigation that is very common in the United States.
Although Cristiano Ronaldo is accustomed to media attention, inherent in the fact that he is a famous person, it is absolutely deplorable that the media continue to propagate and stimulate an intentional defamation campaign based on stolen and easily manipulated digital documents.
Cristiano Ronaldo has mandated his lawyers in the United States and Europe to deal with all legal aspects and expresses full confidence that the truth will prevail, despite the corruption of counterinformation, and in which the laws of Nevada will be enforced and respected.
Ok so CR lawyer is running with: The Football Leaks documents are false.
I like it, and truly consider it the right approach. Those documents have seemed so incredibly dubious from the start - both due to their content (who in their right mind would admit to such a thing in writing?), and also (although this is a much less weightier point) the name he chose to sign it with (one would expect him to include dos Santos Aveiro).
The stance of the defence is expected, and I refer you to what yours truly and @Seven from the Tuz Law Firm has said all along; it is highly unlikely that the september 2009 document is real.
It's gonna be a thrill to follow the events of this "case" further down the line. I'm also enjoying the fact that Mayorga's defence did not put forward any hard evidence at their press conference, and in the following days have only stated that they will "call up Ronaldo's former girlfriends to hear what they have to say".
It's looking good.
I like it, and truly consider it the right approach. Those documents have seemed so incredibly dubious from the start - both due to their content (who in their right mind would admit to such a thing in writing?), and also (although this is a much less weightier point) the name he chose to sign it with (one would expect him to include dos Santos Aveiro).
The stance of the defence is expected, and I refer you to what yours truly and @Seven from the Tuz Law Firm has said all along; it is highly unlikely that the september 2009 document is real.
It's gonna be a thrill to follow the events of this "case" further down the line. I'm also enjoying the fact that Mayorga's defence did not put forward any hard evidence at their press conference, and in the following days have only stated that they will "call up Ronaldo's former girlfriends to hear what they have to say".
It's looking good.