At some times and for some particular places on the field, we can afford taking such a risk, esp if we can benefit from such a risk in the future.
Last year for ex, we wasted an entire season with a completely useless player (Molinaro) who actively harmed our team, by offering nothing, only to allow him integrate and allowed become good enough, to become harmless.
A whole freakin season!!! And the benefits of we gained were minimal, because such a limited players will never reach the desired levels.
If we had done that at each and every game we could last year, n matter if we could afford it or not,
we ought to try more some of our very talented young players, who actually do have the potential to become great additions for our future (DC, Giovinco)
,given the chance, against the inferior teams at least, minimizing the risks.
At this point we cannot afford a full squad of exp and valuable players.
therefore we are forced to field some of lower quality along with them.
But we have to make sure that the proportion of the low quality players, remains a minority. This is why our team suffers, because unfortunately, many of those low quality players are starters (molinaro, grygera, Marchionni)
which makes it even more difficult to tolerate even more, or survive without our difference makers in a good day. We intentionally negletted the quality percentage of our starters and we know have to live with that and the consequences...