Claudio Marchisio (98 Viewers)

Klin

نحن الروبوتات
May 27, 2009
61,692
Shouldn't have even bothered going out of the dressing room for the first half.

Another average performance in the 3-5-2. Change formation, or hit the bench.
 

Linebreak

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2009
16,022
Conte has really destroyed him with the whole 3-5-2. He's actually destroyed our whole midfields fluidity. It's now rare to see our midfield involved in a nice series of dangerous passes like earlier this season with the 4-3-3. Where the hell did Conte get this 3-5-2 idea from?
 

Lo-Pan

Disciple of Gonzo
Feb 11, 2009
2,788
In recent weeks he has gone back into his shell, guilty of the same problem I have seen in previous seasons. In games like this one, to do such a thing, to not impose himself in any way on the midfield, when we are facing off against a huge brute in Mayhem Miller’s elder brother Van Bommel, an african mercenary in Muntari and a aggressive, technically gifted Nocerino with a point to prove against his old club…is a sin. And a worrying sign for his future. Its a shame we didn’t get the indonesian warrior in January, for I am sure that it would be Marchisio’s place at threat, and when he goes through patches like this one, he would be benched. Vidal, Pirlo, Nainggolan…

would be incredibly strong. Claudio did try to get involved, but even slow, old man Pirlo showed more strength and determination against the muscle up against us. Very disappointing. 5/10
 

frick

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2010
4,944
:howler: 'Technically gifted Nocerino'.
Did we even watch the same match? Nocerino's first touch seems awful and I did notice once he lost possesion because of it while I can't remember Marchisio did same thing (in fact whoscored.com shows Marchisio only lose the ball once---Nocerino lose thrice and as a comparison Vidal lose seven times)

Marchisio got a CLEAN tackle from behind when Van Bommel (IIRC) almost got thru in front of the box, and there was a moment when he stole the ball from Rubinho two consecutively times in the 2nd half. I don't mean to disrespect Pirlo but can't you even notice that Marchisio shows more running and pressing when the opposition is in possesion?
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,526
I always thought he was good. Was disappointed last season but then I realized Delneri was at fault. The guy is great when he's playing where he's supposed to.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,526
Cool.

---------- Post added 26.02.2012 at 01:23 ----------

Alright, I'm about to sleep this off. Kinda feel queasy when I close my eyes but its starting to wear off a little. Night Matt and Mino and wohoever else is the fuck online.
 

Lo-Pan

Disciple of Gonzo
Feb 11, 2009
2,788
:howler: 'Technically gifted Nocerino'.
Did we even watch the same match? Nocerino's first touch seems awful and I did notice once he lost possesion because of it while I can't remember Marchisio did same thing (in fact whoscored.com shows Marchisio only lose the ball once---Nocerino lose thrice and as a comparison Vidal lose seven times)

Marchisio got a CLEAN tackle from behind when Van Bommel (IIRC) almost got thru in front of the box, and there was a moment when he stole the ball from Rubinho two consecutively times in the 2nd half. I don't mean to disrespect Pirlo but can't you even notice that Marchisio shows more running and pressing when the opposition is in possesion?
I should have added in 'for a midfield dog of war' which is what I meant. Marchisio's job for us is very different to Nocerino's job for Milan. They are very different kinds of players. Marchisio's technique is obviously better, but even so, who has scored more goals this season??? And when you look at their jobs, nocerino gets forward far less than marchisio who holds deep far less. For a scrapper, Nocerino has solid technique.

Its more Marchisio's job to run, hustle and stride forward. Pirlo is a regista, but no...These last few weeks I have seen Pirlo do more pressing and tackling and intercepting. Milan can afford to play 3 tough guys in the middle, because their offence is top class. Our nearest like for like would be Vidal, Marrone, Padoin...three players who love to hustle, tackle, cover and run. We cannot do this though, as our attack needs more help to score goals (than Milan's attack).
 

frick

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2010
4,944
First of all, technique isn't a sole deciding factor for goalscoring.
2nd, you said Marchisio's job is different from Nocerino yet you compare the two (techniques, goalscoring record).
3rd, you said Marchisio's technique is better and then proceeding with saying Nocerino's technique is solid... so that makes Marchisio's even more solid which is something I'd agree.
4th, a simple fact that our observation differs for Pirlo's pressing compared to Marchisio's mean there's something different of how perceive things which is why I think we won't have an acceptable arguments between us here (but I can say for the fact that whoscored.com's data would agree with me).
 

Lo-Pan

Disciple of Gonzo
Feb 11, 2009
2,788
First of all, technique isn't a sole deciding factor for goalscoring.
2nd, you said Marchisio's job is different from Nocerino yet you compare the two (techniques, goalscoring record).
3rd, you said Marchisio's technique is better and then proceeding with saying Nocerino's technique is solid... so that makes Marchisio's even more solid which is something I'd agree.
4th, a simple fact that our observation differs for Pirlo's pressing compared to Marchisio's mean there's something different of how perceive things which is why I think we won't have an acceptable arguments between us here (but I can say for the fact that whoscored.com's data would agree with me).
It was you who first compared them directly. I didn't. I mentioned the midfield opponents we were facing. There is a difference...between to face and to compare.

My comparison was a response to your comparison. Yes, without a doubt...as i wrote...marchisio is clearly has better technique. I am not looking for an argument, discussion yes.

Who ever said that technique was a sole measure for goalscoring? I was illustrating my point that they have different jobs, different positions, but nocerino, even from been deployed far deeper, with far more focus on tackling and breaking up play, has scored more goals...when marchisio's job for us, is far more focused on scoring and creating goals, than nocerino's job is for milan. Anyway, I am just repeating myself...if you respond, say something new, rather than just getting uppity. Its debate, not a word scrap.
 

frick

Senior Member
Apr 4, 2010
4,944
Didn't have much time for this so just a part of your post I'd comment.

It was you who first compared them directly. I didn't. I mentioned the midfield opponents we were facing. There is a difference...between to face and to compare.
I was merely referring to this:
Marchisio's technique is obviously better, but even so, who has scored more goals this season???
What's the point? I mean yes, so Nocerino scored more goals. It could be because of the players but it could also be because of their different tactics and roles. Nocerino scoring more doesn't prove he's technically gifted (but if you didn't mean this then okay, I'm just asserting), if more it proves that Milan's tactics don't make him as mere holding midfielder as you've said but more than that, which may or may not have been employed to Marchisio's role. Which is why I've said that with different way of perceiving matches we won't agree with anything here, as a simple one like who's more hardworking/pressuring opponents more between Marchisio and Pirlo, and we're different. The problem is you think Nocerino has more less offensive role yet he goalscoring record is better, and you're tying to make it a point which shouldn't be the case in my opinion. What if Nocerino is indeed has less offensive roles, but Milan is a more attacking team in a general---wouldn't that make certain players in the same position will naturally outscore the one in the less offensive team? In fact Milan has much better goalscoring record than us.

Whatever the case is I won't pursue this anymore, thank you for your time and I'm sorry if I said something wrong.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 92)