You're too harsh with Lippi, a manager who's decisions have brought us every year (except last year) to a european final. I was a bit concerned about Conte's sub, but it proved a good sub as thanks to that, our midfield took over Milan's midfield and we created more chances.
Zala's sub was good too. Davids got injured and since it was the last sub, we needed a striker, and between one that hasn't scored in 3/4 and another who scored 3 goals in the last 2 games, Lippi obviously opted for the latter one. Also the fact that Zala is stronger and therefore can hold the ball better for the team to go up and attack was probably another factor. Unluckily this tactic did not work out, even though theoretically it was a good idea.
What is so lucky about a guy who makes a good decision? So why isn't he unlucky when he loses? In a one legged final, it's the players who make the game not the coach. Surely enough Montero's LB position is questionable, but I trust Lippi had a good reason to do so.
People should stop complaining about our coach, but more on the players who did not deliver.
Zala's sub was good too. Davids got injured and since it was the last sub, we needed a striker, and between one that hasn't scored in 3/4 and another who scored 3 goals in the last 2 games, Lippi obviously opted for the latter one. Also the fact that Zala is stronger and therefore can hold the ball better for the team to go up and attack was probably another factor. Unluckily this tactic did not work out, even though theoretically it was a good idea.
What is so lucky about a guy who makes a good decision? So why isn't he unlucky when he loses? In a one legged final, it's the players who make the game not the coach. Surely enough Montero's LB position is questionable, but I trust Lippi had a good reason to do so.
People should stop complaining about our coach, but more on the players who did not deliver.
Buy on AliExpress.com
