Monsters exist but they are too few in number to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are the functionaries ready to believe and to act without asking questions
--- Primo Levi
Thanks to the good fellows at The Pirate Bay, I get to watch quite a few movies well before they come to the cinema near me. Such facilities help in deciding which of them is actually worth going to shell out cash on. For example, I knew way before time that even my corpse would not be found in a cinema paying to watch the latest instalment of Underworld, same way I'd rather see 2004's German production Stauffenberg than pay to see Hollywood blockbuster Valkeyrie. Just a matter of preference, but then that isn't what is under discussion here...
A few weeks ago, I got to see each of the three films that are the rave of this year's Hollywood awards season. Much has been made about Slumdog Millionaire as the ultimate film of the year. It is expected to cart home the Best Movie award in this year's Oscars, much as it has been named movie of the year in the Golden Globes and the BAFTAs. It is a good movie, nay, an excellent movie. But I would be loathe to place it in the same sphere as The Godfather as some people are already suggesting. Slumdog is a feel good movie in which people's fantasies come to life. Poor, little guy from the ghetto makes it good and recovers the love of his life in the process, and against astonishing odds. Personally I'm of the opinion that the movie is not much better than Dr. Zhivago. What works in its favour is the fact that we are in a particularly bad depression, and people need something to take their minds away from the day to day realities of today's life. That is where The Reader falls flat on its face, but more on that movie later.
The other movie that the critics are going all orgasmic over is The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. In my opinion that is a good movie, but nowhere near great, and I am struggling to understand what people see in that film. In my opinion it is nothing more than an unbelievable love story adapted from a book that took a highly improbable event as its storyline. I simply can't come to terms with all the noise being made about Brad Pitt's performance in the movie as the vast majority of it was enhanced by CGI. I'm still of the opinion that Mr. Pitt's best ever performance was in The Twelve Monkeys, but then again, that is just me. The story of Ben Button for me is one very forgettable love story which will not stand the test of time. And ultimately, that is what differentiates the regular, good movies from the all time greats. Gone With The Wind is an all time great. People still talk about it today seventy years after it came on screen. The Godfather is an all time great, people still quote whole passages from that movie, and it is unarguable that all movies from the Mafia genre lift ideas from it up until this day. That is what distinguishes a truly great movie.
I wonder why The Dark Knight was not nominated for Best Picture in this year's Academy Awards. That only goes to confirm what a lot of people have been saying that the Hollywood Academy has a thing against blockbusters...
I for one I tend to be very cynical, but I have to admit that this is one movie that lived up to the hype. Heath Ledger's performance in that movie was excellent, but besides all that dick sucking (Chxta remember your New Year's resolution), the movie had an excellent plot, and the acting all round was great. I would go slightly against the grain here and say that Ledger was not even the best actor in the movie. Aaron Eckhart played a superb role as 'Harvey Dent' and Gary Oldman was excellent as 'Gordon'. Now I can place my head on the block and say that The Dark Knight is a movie which would be referred to in another half century as a shiny example of how an action film ought to be made, and that my dear readers is what a great movie is. I believe that Slumdog and Ben Button would sadly, but ultimately, be forgotten in the sands of time.
One of the other movies that was nominated for best movie is The Reader. Of all the movies that were nominated for that award, this is probably the most lambasted by the critics. However, in Chxta's opinion, this is the most cerebral of all of the movies on display in this year's Oscars. Well of all that I've seen anyway.
The movie's start I must admit is rather damp, and if I were interested in looking at sex scenes I may well just make a beeline to Youporn. However, the film starts to pick up just after Hanna Schmitz (Kate Winslett) disappears and poor Michael Berg (Ralph Fiennes/David Kross) is left heart broken. Then we fast forward to the young man's rediscovery of his erstwhile lover. As the allegations unfold of her role in selecting prisoners for death, he must face the terrible truth that the woman he loved, and still loves (love is a bitch isn't it?) and who loved him in return, had committed terrible atrocities.
But who was the real Hanna Schmitz?
The truth is that Hanna Schmitz is not based on any one real life character. She is more a composite of various members of the SS-Oberaufseherin. Bernhard Schlink - on who's book of the same name the movie is based - has said in interviews that he once met someone when he was a student on vacation from university and working night shifts in a factory. In the confessional small hours of the morning, he was told a personal tale that set him on the path towards the character of Hanna. Who she was and what she did, however, he will not elaborate on. But though Hanna cannot be linked to a real person, she has a chilling reality about her. She is in all of us!
Hanna became a camp guard for the simplest of reasons. At the Siemens factory where she was working, she was offered promotion to foreman because she was a good and diligent worker. However, this promotion would have exposed the fact that she was illiterate, something that was her innermost shame. To avoid having this shame exposed, she took a job at Auschwitz, the most notorious of all the concentration camps.
The shame continues to haunt her life because as a tram conductor after the war, she was a very diligent worker, and was once again offered a promotion. A promotion which again would have exposed her illiteracy. Like she had done a decade before, she took off, leaving young Michael Berg heartbroken. Her pattern of running from her shame ultimately destroyed her because in court, she could have exonerated herself over the deaths of hundreds of women by confessing she could not read or write, but she refused to do so.
In her mind, illiteracy was more shaming than murder and as a result, in her world, all normal sense of right and wrong had been destroyed. This view point must not be seen as forgiving or excusing what people like Hanna do or have done. But we must bear one thing in mind here: the human mind is probably the most powerful force on earth, and one of the most difficult things to come to terms with is that not all people who do monstrous things are monsters.
In his book, Schlink suggests that there is a line that individuals may step over for the smallest of reasons, as Hanna did. But, once that line crossed, anything goes, and there is no way back. Because she had crossed that line, Hanna never understood that what she did wrong. When asked in court why she had selected women for death, she explained, logically but absurdly, that new inmates were arriving and sending older inmates to their deaths was the only way to make room for them. What else could she do, she asked, bemused. Then she turns the question on the judge. 'What would you have done?' she wants to know. He does not answer.
This for me was the fulcrum of the entire movie. It is a chilling and telling moment. As people, we all hope that if and when the time comes, we would stand up to be counted, that we would do the right thing. But none of us can be absolutely sure we would be brave enough to occupy the moral high ground. Every one of us has that little secret, that moment of excruciatingly painful shame, or sinfully shameful yet orgasmic pleasure. That moment that we would rather die (Hanna Schmitz would have gladly taken the gallows than let the world know she was illiterate) than let other people know about. As to the question of who the real Hanna Schmitz was? She was the fallible human being in each and every one of us.