i know what you are trying to say but teams that have many men behind the ball won't have a big problem with that.
through balls are wonderful, but when the opponent sits deep there is NO space to play the ball between the backline and the goal ... no space to run into
it is surely much easier to just kick the ball away for a defender, when in the final third of the opponents half every 5 metres there is a defending player...
perhaps i need glasses, but i don't see xabi do magic here ... perhaps you could provide videos where he ever did that against a deep lying defense ... i really guess you won't find one...
assuming that claudio ranieri does know a little more about football than all of us here combined (there will be a reason for him being payed for what he does) and also assuming he did see where we struggled there might be a reason for not spending big on alonso...
yes, we might be pretty much reliant on the wingers (nedved, giovinco, camo) but you know what is said ... you win games with the attack, but win trophies with the backline
to summarize my problem with alonso.
-he is to expensive (for what he would bring US)
-we would probably get more situations on the wings where we could get a cross or pass in .... but remember ... without someone making these crosses you gain nothing ... i must add that camoranesis crosses were awful at times, too (not only molinaros known crosses over all players in the box)
through balls are wonderful, but when the opponent sits deep there is NO space to play the ball between the backline and the goal ... no space to run into
it is surely much easier to just kick the ball away for a defender, when in the final third of the opponents half every 5 metres there is a defending player...
perhaps i need glasses, but i don't see xabi do magic here ... perhaps you could provide videos where he ever did that against a deep lying defense ... i really guess you won't find one...
assuming that claudio ranieri does know a little more about football than all of us here combined (there will be a reason for him being payed for what he does) and also assuming he did see where we struggled there might be a reason for not spending big on alonso...
yes, we might be pretty much reliant on the wingers (nedved, giovinco, camo) but you know what is said ... you win games with the attack, but win trophies with the backline
to summarize my problem with alonso.
-he is to expensive (for what he would bring US)
-we would probably get more situations on the wings where we could get a cross or pass in .... but remember ... without someone making these crosses you gain nothing ... i must add that camoranesis crosses were awful at times, too (not only molinaros known crosses over all players in the box)
