[Champions League] JUVENTUS 2-0 Celtic (March 6, 2013) (51 Viewers)

MOTM?

  • Buffon

  • Barzagli

  • Pogba

  • Matri

  • Quagliarella

  • Pirlo


Results are only viewable after voting.

Linebreak

Senior Member
Sep 18, 2009
16,021
Thats a very odd question you pose there, and from tactical point of view, not very smart, sorry.


There is no such thing as "a tactic against the strong opponent".

You look at where you excell, and where the opponent excells. Juventus has allways been about tactically neutralising the opposing treath, and trying to play our game in a way that hurts them when we got in possession.

Against barcelona, this would obviously mean we'd go 3-5-2,play it compact and deep, focus primarely on ruling out trough passes, have marchisio breaking up the passing, vidal pressuring, have the ss helping vidal, have matri keeping the defence buzy. generally force them into the physical duel, and when we have possession, make one of the wingbacks race up the field, with 1 cm and the two strikers supporting. the rest should keep tactical position.

Against real we would play more our pressing game, and try to break their defensively week midfield, giving them troubles reaching their forwards. wingbacks pressing to but without risk, cause di maria and ronaldo are lethal.

etc. each opponent has a playstyle we must attempt to counter. If they are better at their game then we are, then we should not "play our game" but focus to disrupt theirs in general.


For this reason its best we try to avoid a bayern munchen. they are very complete, and can handle our physical game. It would require a specialist team like Madrid, or a wildcard like psg or milan (who got a worldclass striker capable of deciding it suddenly, while the team's defence has a chance of holding it)

I hope bayern get dortmund. that will be mad fun
Sheesh I just wanted to get people's point of view - not initiate personal attacks.

But since you opened the door then your attempted spelling of the word in bold further down your post is not very smart either.
 

ZoSo

TSUUUUUUU
Jul 11, 2011
41,646
fiat also belongs to fiat and they have a myriad of shitty cars.

as for maserattis, they're mostly old people cars. for that price you can get so much better.
@Interdestroyer

i know you're italian and a big ferrari fan but back me up on this :D
100%. The only people I see driving Maseratis are old people/business types who wouldn't really enjoy it, just use it as luxury ride to never go fast. They're ok, but for a bit more money you can get a Ferrari. A Gallardo probably costs about the same here. And yeah, a 911 (Turbo?) for probably around the same price would be way better. Nissan GTR over a Maserati anyday of the week (besides MC12 :p).

@ALC
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,033
100%. The only people I see driving Maseratis are old people/business types who wouldn't really enjoy it, just use it as luxury ride to never go fast. They're ok, but for a bit more money you can get a Ferrari. A Gallardo probably costs about the same here. And yeah, a 911 (Turbo?) for probably around the same price would be way better. Nissan GTR over a Maserati anyday of the week (besides MC12 :p).

@ALC
:p

thanks for showing them what's up. it's all about brand names to these mofos.
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,685
I think you are missing the point, ALC - Maserati are plush, luxury touring sports cars and aren't build with the same philosophy/purpose as say a GTR or a Vette or even a Porsche. Sure, for less or about the same money one can get a better sports car (faster, better cornering, etc) but you wouldn't be getting the elegance and luxury of a Maserati.

All in all, it's not just about how much money it costs but what you are looking for in return too.
 

ZoSo

TSUUUUUUU
Jul 11, 2011
41,646
I think you are missing the point, ALC - Maserati are plush, luxury touring sports cars and aren't build with the same philosophy/purpose as say a GTR or a Vette or even a Porsche. Sure, for less or about the same money one can get a better sports car (faster, better cornering, etc) but you wouldn't be getting the elegance and luxury of a Maserati.

All in all, it's just about how much money it costs but what you are looking for in return too.
Their luxury is probably not that good compared to a German car say, S-Class vs Quattroporte. You can probably always get a better car than a Maserati.

p.s. Fiat owns Ferrari... Ferrari > Maserati.
 

ALC

Ohaulick
Oct 28, 2010
46,033
whatever, i'm not about to get into this again :D

i still think they're not worth it.

- - - Updated - - -

Their luxury is probably not that good compared to a German car say, S-Class vs Quattroporte. You can probably always get a better car than a Maserati.

p.s. Fiat owns Ferrari... Ferrari > Maserati.
:agree: nothing really stands about about maseratis imo. sure they have a ferrari engine, but there's so much more to ferraris
 

ZoSo

TSUUUUUUU
Jul 11, 2011
41,646
whatever, i'm not about to get into this again :D

i still think they're not worth it.

- - - Updated - - -



:agree: nothing really stands about about maseratis imo. sure they have a ferrari engine, but there's so much more to ferraris
Actually I think the engines are the other way around. I know the V12 Enzo engine was based on the V8 quattroporte but shhhh :p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 51)