now you're just speaking nonsense
I will try to explain and then have to go to count sheep - you can't speak of value comparison of two very different entities that offer you very different things in return for your money. E.g you can't say in a sports car I want what Maserati offers and then counter that with "but a GTR/Vette is cheaper, so I am gonna go it that instead. Why? Because a GTR offers something comepletely diff than a Mazerati, so there is no basis for comparison in value between the two as you'd be getting different things in return for your money. To make it clearer - you compare a GTR with other similar sports cars that have superior acceleration and handling as top priority - Vette, Porsche, Viper, etc - and then you determine which one gives you better value but you do so for cars that are comparable to one another. A Maserati, as I mentioned earlier, is a car with a rather diff purpose than those above, which means you have no basis for comparison, hence cannot determine a better or worse value, only lower and higher price.
As for comparing a Ferrari with a Maserati - it's still way off target as the former cost considerably more and are pure sports, albeit exclusive, cars that do not focus on luxury, comfort of the ride etc. ... i.e. Ferrari's and Maseratis may have similar engines but have very diff philosophies behind them - and quite frankly the fact that Fiat/Ferrari owns Maserati, should be quite telling of thisas it makes little sense to own a direct competitor.
Same goes for comparing Lamborghinis with Maserati.