Erm, that article is from last season and is not relevant. This season he was given a chance to go on loan in the short term following his return from injury but wanted to remain at Barcelona for this season. It might change again in January.
I assume when you talk about nonsense you mean your previous posts on the subject? Do you even understand the purpose of a youth system?
You said XXX club doesn't loan out players - that was nonsense. Every big club loans out young players who are not playing.
Italy has no reserve league. It is not like Spain where they have a professional B league or England with a reserve league. Even then teams in those countries still loan out their better youngsters. There are talented guys in Italy just training for half a season because they are too old for the Primavera and not considered old enough for the first team squad. But then I am sure I have said this all before. Your argument is that we should not sign any young players or have a youth system because we would just loan them out, really, it is fucking hilarious. Perhaps we just introduce an age limit on our players? They have to be 25 or something perhaps? What happens then if some of those guys (like Almiron) don't play? We can't loan them out so they are stuck with the first team squad disrupting morale, or with the kids, and getting paid 100% of their wages?
Alen made some good points but you decided to twist them. Yago is not playing, so what is your point? He will come back and someone else will take him. Juve will eventually loan out Marrone and Ariaudo, what is your point? Where else should they play? Should we just sell them, even if they might become really good in the future, because they can't play now? You look at Barcelona as some reference point for how a big club deals with young players, yet they do little different at all. If a Lionel Messi came through the youth system at Juventus he would undoubtably be given a chance, and then it is up to the player to take it. The only plus they have is that they have brought through superior young players. Surely this calls for striving for better standards in the current youth academy.
I assume when you talk about nonsense you mean your previous posts on the subject? Do you even understand the purpose of a youth system?
You said XXX club doesn't loan out players - that was nonsense. Every big club loans out young players who are not playing.
Italy has no reserve league. It is not like Spain where they have a professional B league or England with a reserve league. Even then teams in those countries still loan out their better youngsters. There are talented guys in Italy just training for half a season because they are too old for the Primavera and not considered old enough for the first team squad. But then I am sure I have said this all before. Your argument is that we should not sign any young players or have a youth system because we would just loan them out, really, it is fucking hilarious. Perhaps we just introduce an age limit on our players? They have to be 25 or something perhaps? What happens then if some of those guys (like Almiron) don't play? We can't loan them out so they are stuck with the first team squad disrupting morale, or with the kids, and getting paid 100% of their wages?
Alen made some good points but you decided to twist them. Yago is not playing, so what is your point? He will come back and someone else will take him. Juve will eventually loan out Marrone and Ariaudo, what is your point? Where else should they play? Should we just sell them, even if they might become really good in the future, because they can't play now? You look at Barcelona as some reference point for how a big club deals with young players, yet they do little different at all. If a Lionel Messi came through the youth system at Juventus he would undoubtably be given a chance, and then it is up to the player to take it. The only plus they have is that they have brought through superior young players. Surely this calls for striving for better standards in the current youth academy.
