Cannavaro"Players more Important" (4 Viewers)
- Thread starter Azzurri7
- Start date
I think a perfect example is Atalanta. Before the change of coach, they were doing terribly and by January they were already 'relegated'. Delio Rossi transformed the team and Atalanta ended up winning loads of points in the last months which if they had done so from the beginning they would be fighting for a CL spot! (obviously cos of the number of points not cos they deserved it).
Football is a team sport,
the coach is a member of the team,
probably the brain of the team.
If the body(the players) arent good enough to perform the coaches will then having a good coach is useless.
No player either the coach is the 20-30 or even50% of the team,
With the same logic:
Imagine juve without Buffon,
imagine the perfect tactics set by Cap the team is rolling and a mediocre keeper concedes in every good chance the oposition had.
Buffon is there and making the dif in the final score so he worths about 30%?
Cannavaro? if he wasnt there, such a world class player who would make the dif? remember our defence last year?
Canna is about 40% better than Montero so as our defence this year, think of having less exp or potent player, we would concede far more goals than of the other defenders mistakes, so Canna worths about 20%.
xcuse me 19%
the rest 1% is for Camo,Zlatan,Emo,Zambro,Thuram,Neddy etc etc
So any team in Italy,
lets say Lecce or even Udinese could have won this scudetto if they had Cap+Buffon+canna in their ranks?
I m sure some people may believe this but i hope not too many,
football is a sport, u cant win it without good athlets,
Why do the athlets cost more than the coach?
(the athlets are so many but the coaches so few,
since they are so rare and much more important than every player why they dont get what they merit?)
Why Capello doesnt win the championship every year?
He doent apply the same mental work?
Why sould we worry if Milan buy Gilardino,janku,Liunberg and Chivu next year since they ll still keep Ancelotti?
rating one man (player,coach, not the President)
more than 5-10% is already a great honour,
considering that there are 22players, trainer assistants, medical stuff etc etc.
the coach is a member of the team,
probably the brain of the team.
If the body(the players) arent good enough to perform the coaches will then having a good coach is useless.
No player either the coach is the 20-30 or even50% of the team,
With the same logic:
Imagine juve without Buffon,
imagine the perfect tactics set by Cap the team is rolling and a mediocre keeper concedes in every good chance the oposition had.
Buffon is there and making the dif in the final score so he worths about 30%?
Cannavaro? if he wasnt there, such a world class player who would make the dif? remember our defence last year?
Canna is about 40% better than Montero so as our defence this year, think of having less exp or potent player, we would concede far more goals than of the other defenders mistakes, so Canna worths about 20%.
xcuse me 19%
the rest 1% is for Camo,Zlatan,Emo,Zambro,Thuram,Neddy etc etc
So any team in Italy,
lets say Lecce or even Udinese could have won this scudetto if they had Cap+Buffon+canna in their ranks?
I m sure some people may believe this but i hope not too many,
football is a sport, u cant win it without good athlets,
Why do the athlets cost more than the coach?
(the athlets are so many but the coaches so few,
since they are so rare and much more important than every player why they dont get what they merit?)
Why Capello doesnt win the championship every year?
He doent apply the same mental work?
Why sould we worry if Milan buy Gilardino,janku,Liunberg and Chivu next year since they ll still keep Ancelotti?
rating one man (player,coach, not the President)
more than 5-10% is already a great honour,
considering that there are 22players, trainer assistants, medical stuff etc etc.
