Jem83 your legal analysis is only useful regarding civil liability. The three pronged approach to determining objective liability can keep Juve in the clear regarding being sued but it won’t help the FIGC give titles back. If they determine that Moggi’s actions of legally calling referee designators (which was actually within the scope of his responsibilities) led to our victories then they can argue that the title was won wrongfully and still not assign it. Civil court and sport justice aren’t the same.
We’re not going to France but for the sake of an example the Israeli teams play in UEFA competitions as opposed to Asian.
In any case I think the posters in this thread lost sight of what matters. If Agnelli goes to a round table and successfully negotiates money or titles (doubt either will happen) it wouldn’t mean much so long as Moggi is still considered guilty. I’m speaking in logical terms now. We would simply be viewed as a team with a powerful president who imposed his will and got recognition for titles that were won "illegitimately".
As fans of the club we should be more interested in another matter. Moggi didn’t cheat. I would prefer if some level of authority civil or otherwise would acknowledge that first. As a result I am far more concerned with Moggi’s appeals. Getting the titles and compensation then would mean so much more because it wouldn’t be the result of an agreement between rich assholes but the result of authorities admitting that we were wrongfully punished for cheating when no cheating occurred.
As far as getting the titles back, you are absolutely right, a civil court cannot overrule the sport's law and hand us the titles. That can't happen in a civil court.
I suppose I lost track of that, but most of my comments regarding the titles were written before the TNAS decision.
The scudetti are either lost for good or we are getting them back at that meeting. Which we won't. So they are lost for good (officially).
Getting cleared of objective liability can still be very positive for us, though, because it can help build a case against the FIGC in a civil court. If errors were made, if Juve as a club were not objectively liable, and still was sent down a division when other clubs who did the same thing more or less got away with it, then Juventus can build a case of "culpa" against the FIGC. In other words, a case that goes out to prove that the FIGC are responsible for Juve's losses on grounds of subjective liability. Which will be a case that will only be about compensation, not titles.
That can happen in a civil court, and I suppose that's what Juve wants to do.
But yeah, as for the titles, officially they are staying at Inter now that TNAS has declared itself incompetent. That train has now gone.
EDIT: I think Agnelli has every intention of taking the FIGC to court for compensation. I think that the arranged ("tavolo")-meeting is AA wanting to make a final attempt of getting those scudetti back, as a precaution, or as a way of getting the best of both worlds.
We'll probably get nothing whatsoever, but I like that he's trying.