Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (57 Viewers)

blondu

Grazie Ale
Nov 9, 2006
27,404
In the end I am an Inter fan that have seen them play only one match this season against Juventus but the rest of the time I have watched each and every Juventus match bar one where I was travelling. I was getting happy and screaming, waking my one year old kid up at each goal Juve scored and getting sad and angry at each goal they conceded. I have been doing that since 1986 and will be doing it for as long as I have the possibility to do it. I have been to Turin three times for the sole purpose of watching Juventus play, I have screamed my lungs out in matches, I have spent fortunes on Juve official merchandise from the store at Via Garibaldi and from their online store.

Yet I am either an Inter fan or a retard. I can also be a fucking cunt.

That's it for me for today.
don't take it personal...rab is a heart before mind person and i'm sure he didn't think at you when he wrote that, and yo shouldn't feel yourself
 
Aug 1, 2003
17,696
I quite understand JCK's point. No doubt this whole thing is farce and Moggi is being hard done by, and in no way am I discrediting him for being the smart contributing director he was, but for some reason, I do not believe he is entirely innocent either. I think this whole calcio business, especially in Italy is too dirty to be completely immeasurably innocent. Like many others pointed out, the issue is that this was all orchestrated to bring Juventus down, not clean the league of its crooks. That's the sad part - for if Moggi's 'guilty' surely others are too but nothing's been done.

Perhaps Juve did not stick with Moggi because there's something we don't know, or that Moggi's a liability now or a mere scapegoat. What I do not understand though is by doing that, it is almost admitting that Moggi will be found guilty, and thus Juventus. Although Juve is cleared of objective liability etc, if Moggi's guilty Juve surely would be compromised along with it, at least in the minds of people.

Whatever it is, to this day, five years on, sometimes when I think about this whole farce, and looking at the sad state of our dear club right now, I can honestly say there are moments where I am overwhelmed with both anger and sadness; that the suffering is quite measurable. Yeah some people say there's more to life, it's just football etc, but I think I'm sure people here understand the feeling. All I'm thinking of now is that clubs usually have phases of their ups and downs, and I just hope I get to see Juve when they're back on being the most feared club again.

And when that day comes.....
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
I haven't trawled through the thread, but here's my take on the verdict anyway:

Moggi's whole 'all innocent or all guilty' argument was rather flawed from his personal point of view. He didn't seem to put forward a lot of evidence claiming his own innocence, focusing more on the guilt of others. So, even if he proved others were guilty, he was also still going to be found guilty himself.

However, if the evidence put forward is deemed to show the guilt or potential guilt of directors at other clubs, that could be useful to Juventus in their aim to disprove the idea that they had an exclusive relationship with the refs and designators, which was a key factor in their demotion.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,556
blʘndu;3348986 said:
don't take it personal...rab is a heart before mind person and i'm sure he didn't think at you when he wrote that, and yo shouldn't feel yourself
No, he didn't mean me personally at first just when he got heard my opinion he chose to disrespect it and insist that either I am an Inter fan or I am contradicting yourself. And not any where I wrote that Moggi fixed matches except that he made phone calls like any other person.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,556
I haven't trawled through the thread, but here's my take on the verdict anyway:

Moggi's whole 'all innocent or all guilty' argument was rather flawed from his personal point of view. He didn't seem to put forward a lot of evidence claiming his own innocence, focusing more on the guilt of others. So, even if he proved others were guilty, he was also still going to be found guilty himself.

However, if the evidence put forward is deemed to show the guilt or potential guilt of directors at other clubs, that could be useful to Juventus in their aim to disprove the idea that they had an exclusive relationship with the refs and designators, which was a key factor in their demotion.
Exactly, thank you very much. Moggi did not try to prove himself innocent, he was just showing that the others were doing the same. Now if the courts did not want to judge the others, it is a whole different story.
 

blondu

Grazie Ale
Nov 9, 2006
27,404
No, he didn't mean me personally at first just when he got heard my opinion he chose to disrespect it and insist that either I am an Inter fan or I am contradicting yourself. And not any where I wrote that Moggi fixed matches except that he made phone calls like any other person.
i think you both are correct...you gotta admit that juve was moggi in that time so juve going away with it and moggi sentenced is stupid, and rab needs to understand that talking to the ref designator is something wrong...not that wrong to sent us to b, but it ain't legal and ethic whatever they talked about.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,556
blʘndu;3349100 said:
i think you both are correct...you gotta admit that juve was moggi in that time so juve going away with it and moggi sentenced is stupid, and rab needs to understand that talking to the ref designator is something wrong...not that wrong to sent us to b, but it ain't legal and ethic whatever they talked about.
The thing is I am respecting his and anyone's opinion while a few others aren't. And the fact that the word "guilty" has to be brought up is somehow strange as I said that I cannot use the word as I have no idea about anything related to the legal system in Italy and why he was judged guilty. I already explained that for me he was doing something the others were doing and that does not make it right. The accusations that he was running a system and fixing matches are all bullshit for me, I have never even mentioned them as they are obviously fabrications but still some are feeding them in my mouth.
 

Jem83

maitre'd at Canal Bar
Nov 7, 2005
22,866
blʘndu;3349100 said:
i think you both are correct...you gotta admit that juve was moggi in that time so juve going away with it and moggi sentenced is stupid, and rab needs to understand that talking to the ref designator is something wrong...not that wrong to sent us to b, but it ain't legal and ethic whatever they talked about.
For the upteenth time, it's only stupid if you don't understand what objective liability is!

Not everything employees do should drag the employer down with them, you know..

Let's say you own a car repair shop and you hire some 18 year old kid who, when you're not looking, takes one of the cars that are in for repair out for a drive and then crashes into a crowd of people and kills a couple of them. This scenario is based on one of the many cases of objective liability I've studied in norwegian law, and the Supreme Court ruled that the employee had acted too far away from his assigned tasks to make his employer objectively liable.

I will admit to the fact that Moggi's actions were closer to his actual tasks than what this stupid kid did, so the cases can't really be compared fully, but the court in Naples still found that Juventus could not be identified with Moggi's actions.

So no, according to the Naples trial, Moggi's actions were not Juve's actions, and therefore, legally, Moggi can be found guilty while at the same time Juve can go free.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
123,556
blʘndu;3349112 said:
:tup:...so can we get something from this verdict through figc? i mean the official scudetto's back
I don't think so, I never thought anything legal would happen from the Italian courts. As I said earlier today, the damage has been done and it won't be repaired.
 

Jem83

maitre'd at Canal Bar
Nov 7, 2005
22,866
I don't think so, I never thought anything legal would happen from the Italian courts. As I said earlier today, the damage has been done and it won't be repaired.
True, the damage can never be fully repaired, but Agnelli must fight for the official reinstatement of the ventinuove, because we actually have a chance to get it.
 
OP
gsol

gsol

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2007
1,448
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #14,858
    Guys I had no access to anything yesterday and am catching up on 35 pages here.

    My opinion? I’m not shocked. I said a long time ago to not get caught up in all the evidence that favored us because civil court or not, this is Italy. I remember saying that this thing would be settled by the rich and influential amidst flowing wine and cigar smoke and the verdict really supports that. Think about it. Every powerful entity involved from the police, to Juventus, Inter, FIGC, Telecom, etc walked away content and the powerless individuals were burned alive.

    Some of the arguments here are a little sketchy. Juventus being cleared and Moggi being convicted will help our case in no way in terms of getting the titles back. It only means the club won’t have to pay the teams like Brescia and Bologna that were trying to sue Juventus. According to the civil court the season was still tarnished therefore the title is no closer to us than before.

    Compensation? Who would pay? Clearly Moggi being absolved would have been far better for the team. That would have left the team and Moggi as well as others open to liability suits against Auricchio and eventually other parties like the FIGC, Telecom etc. Care to imagine why the court didn’t go for that?

    Inter relegated and similar requests. Just stop. IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN. They are not on trial and will never be thanks to the statute of limitations. That ship sailed a long time ago.

    UEFA and European courts are a non issue. UEFA want nothing to do with it and there are several levels of Italian courts to go through before the EU becomes possible. We are years away from that. Moggi will appeal but it has to be domestic first and with how slow the wheels turn over there, we will be reading headlines and dates regarding the appeals for another couple of years.

    JCK, think what you want but don’t say that evidence confirmed Moggi’s guilt. The evidence confirmed that he made legal phone calls. Using your analogy, if you drove with traffic and one day the law changed and a recording showed that you were going with traffic in an area deemed illegal after the fact you would find it quite unfair to be condemned for it.
     
    OP
    gsol

    gsol

    Senior Member
    Oct 14, 2007
    1,448
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #14,859
    In the end, fuck this shit. I’m fed up with this topic because it seems fruitless. Obviously I’ll follow it and keep hoping but I really wanted this to be it. In the end I know those titles are ours and that the FIGC will likely never acknowledge it, I know that the compensation is unlikely and that it impacts me financially in no way but it simply bothers me that the injustice is there for all to see and yet the powerful figures in that banana republic continue to operate with such impunity.

    The evidence that Moggi’s team provided was not weak. It wasn’t just “everyone was doing it”, it was more than that. It showed that there was no exclusivity. It showed that others were actually trying to cheat against us and above all else it proved that those alleged to be part of Moggi’s circle (i.e. Bergamo) were actually operating against us. If Moggi was corrupting referees through the designators and the designators were against us…how could the verdict stand? How was the case not thrown out when the defense uncovered Auricchio’s evidence tampering? The answer? Moggi is powerless. That’s why. Our hope of seeing justice served in Italy will likely never occur based on the fact that Moggi canot compete with the power and influence of those he is up against.
     

    JCK

    Biased
    JCK
    May 11, 2004
    123,556
    True, the damage can never be fully repaired, but Agnelli must fight for the official reinstatement of the ventinuove, because we actually have a chance to get it.
    I know the club is trying and they made a statement yesterday that they will work on getting the titles back. I, however, don't think we will get them back but it doesn't matter when everyone knows that we won them.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 50)