Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (49 Viewers)

[denco]

I wonder how much about your beloved Juventus you actually know. I wish it was possible to test your knowledge on Juventus but i am 100% sure it would be shit.

You spout everytime about how you love Juventus but the only proof of this is your anti Inter and anti Milan rubbish

You dont love Juventus, you just hate Inter, Milan and others.

A lot of people on this forum sacrifice a lot by watching Juventus matches on the net, i am yet to see you give any sort of match report apart from 1 line of what everybody has already said.

You are just full of ignorance and hatred. Just a complete waste of time and space really.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Alen]

Denco, this was a hit under the belt. Turk loves Juve like few people do and what you said is not true at all and it will only make him mad and banned eventually.

Please, both of you, concentrate on the topic. Warnings will follow the next time i'll have to interfere.

 

[Dostoevsky]

Hey guys calm down.Don`t fight because of this again.Leave it...

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

why don't you delete anti-juve preacher's post too

 

[Alen]

why don't you delete anti-juve preacher's post too

PM

I hope you'll make a smart decission

 

[gsol]

Grosso and Zambrotta both scored while being positioned behind the midfield. Materazzi scored two perfectly placed headers. I didn't say I didn’t say Zidane played badly. I said he was suffocated. It seemed no matter how well he played he couldn’t break Buffon and the defense. None the less his sending off was so late that it likely made no difference. Ya he would have shot in the shoot out and likely scored but that wouldn’t have kept David from missing. Stop arguing non issues anyway. If you want to talk about Materazzi go to your other forums.

As usual Denco misses the point. Catania sporting director said that after Vargas went to Peru and didn't play, he was not allowed to field him. The same should have been done with Materazzi. He didn't play after being called up. Simple as that.

"Man, pick on someone of your abject lack of intelligence to try and debate with as there is nothing about you that I find remotely interesting so quit looking out for my posts as they are far too much for you to ever grasp."

Whooa easy buddy you might fall off that high horse you think you're on. You think you are a genius but don't ever try talking down to someone else in this thread. Remember in this thread YOU are the bitch.

 

[Bjerknes]

Turk doesn't speak fluent English, while others here do. You can't blast him because he doesn't have any debating skills in this language.

 

[Snoop]

damn this thread is still open.

 

[gsol]

Bottom line this isn't opinion or debatable material. Materazzi was called up and refused based on health. Since he had played the week prior according to the rules he had to skip Catania. I'm not saying I like the rule but it exists and was violated. END OF STORY

Don't worry Denco, the FIGC won't do anything about it.

 

[denco]

Grosso and Zambrotta both scored while being positioned behind the midfield. Materazzi scored two perfectly placed headers. I didn't say I didn’t say Zidane played badly. I said he was suffocated. It seemed no matter how well he played he couldn’t break Buffon and the defense. None the less his sending off was so late that it likely made no difference. Ya he would have shot in the shoot out and likely scored but that wouldn’t have kept David from missing. Stop arguing non issues anyway. If you want to talk about Materazzi go to your other forums.

As usual Denco misses the point. Catania sporting director said that after Vargas went to Peru and didn't play, he was not allowed to field him. The same should have been done with Materazzi. He didn't play after being called up. Simple as that.

"Man, pick on someone of your abject lack of intelligence to try and debate with as there is nothing about you that I find remotely interesting so quit looking out for my posts as they are far too much for you to ever grasp."

Whooa easy buddy you might fall off that high horse you think you're on. You think you are a genius but don't ever try talking down to someone else in this thread. Remember in this thread YOU are the bitch.

You seem to be believing your own hype. A few misinformed retards make you feel like the king of the castle and you buy into that horseshit.

Vargas goes all the way to Peru but did not play, whose fault is that? The guy was injured so he could not play for his NT.

Unless you are suggesting that rule states injured or not if you are called to the Nt and you must play then what you are talking about is complete rubbish as usual.

Do you just argue for the heck of it or do you sometimes have a point?

How can a player show that he is committed to his Nt by going half way round the world but could not play due to injury be blamed for it and not allowed to play for his club in their next game?

But this makes sense to you because you want to prove your blunt point that Inter are being favoured.

Catania's sporting director is just talking nonsense as the fact that Vargas did travel to Peru is enough.

Did the FIGC ban him from playing against Torino because he did not play for his country?

Do they have the authority to do that or is that not FIFA's responsibility?

I dont know how thinsg work nowadays with the Italian FA but in England, the FA cannot stop Fabregas if he does not play for Spain

 

[denco]

Turk doesn't speak fluent English, while others here do. You can't blast him because he doesn't have any debating skills in this language.

Yeah but it is okay for him to shoot his mouth off when its got nothing to do with him?

Sopeaking of which what has it got to do with you anyways?

 

[Bjerknes]

Bottom line this isn't opinion or debatable material. Materazzi was called up and refused based on health. Since he had played the week prior according to the rules he had to skip Catania. I'm not saying I like the rule but it exists and was violated. END OF STORY

Don't worry Denco, the FIGC won't do anything about it.

Honestly, I don't know why denco is even trying to debate this matter. It's a well-known rule and the rule was violated in this case.

 

[Bjerknes]

Yeah but it is okay for him to shoot his mouth off when its got nothing to do with him?

Sopeaking of which what has it got to do with you anyways?

Never said it was okay. But you can't expect him to debate this matter, just like we couldn't expect you to debate it in Turkish.

 

[Alen]

What we don't know for sure is if Vargas was ready to play for Catania after he came back from Peru.
Maybe he was still injured and he couldn't play anyway and what Catania's GD is now saying is pure BS. But maybe he was ready to play but this rule prevented Baldini from fielding him.
The fact is we don't know and now it's opinion vs opinion between you two, while Catania's GD can use the fact that Vargas didn't play in his advantage, even if Vargas was actually injured.
But in Materazzi's case things are more clear and the rule doesn't allow him to play.

 

[denco]

No you would not expect me to debate in Arabic because I would not insult anyone in Arabic.

I would not preach hatred in any language.

If he can throw insults in english then I would expect him to have some knowledge in english to debate his case.

Again I am asking what has this got to do with you?

 

[denco]

What we don't know for sure is if Vargas was ready to play for Catania after he came back from Peru.
Maybe he was still injured and he couldn't play anyway and what Catania's GD is now saying is pure BS. But maybe he was ready to play but this rule prevented Baldini from fielding him.The fact is we don't know and now it's opinion vs opinion between you two, while Catania's GD can use the fact that Vargas didn't play in his advantage, even if Vargas was actually injured.
But in Materazzi's case things are more clear and the rule doesn't allow him to play.

Hold on, Vargas went to Peru, he did not stay in Catania. I am still unsure as to how the FIGC has the power to prevent a Peruvian international from playing for his club.

Did his country insist that he be banned if he did not turn up?

Lets take Christian Zanetti eg, if he is called tot he NT and he refuses, stating like he did that he has retired despite the fact that he has not played for Italy in yonks, does this mean he should be banned from playing for Juventus?

What exactly is the punishment? Deducted points? Fine?

 

[gsol]

The only ones here who are misinformed are the ones who refute the facts. You admitted that you do not read them. Enough said.

As usual you are looking for some loophole somewhere in a rule that you can't re-write. If a player doesn't play in a national game that he was called up for because of injury he has to be absent from a previous or sucessive league game. Vargas wasn't allowed to play for Catania as a result of not playing for Peru after a call up yet Materazzi played. The rule WAS violated. Stop beating a dead horse. You are wrong. You should be used to that.



"I dont know how things work nowadays" no shit

 

[gsol]

Zanetti's example is different. If someone retires then they are not getting called up. Even if they did the excuse would be retirement and not injury. You can be retired from the NT and active for the club Denco. The whole point of this rule is to ensure that if a player skips out on teh NT due to injury that he is actually injured. He demonstrates that by being injured in either the previous or successive league game.

The punishment for fielding an illegal player is a 3-0 loss.

You are only debating this because you want to go against certain people at all costs.

 

[Alen]

Your last post was warned because i think i was clear when i asked you not to go off topic with the discussion about Turk.

Hold on, Vargas went to Peru, he did not stay in Catania. I am still unsure as to how the FIGC has the power to prevent a Peruvian international from playing for his club.

Did his country insist that he be banned if he did not turn up?

Lets take Christian Zanetti eg, if he is called tot he NT and he refuses, stating like he did that he has retired despite the fact that he has not played for Italy in yonks, does this mean he should be banned from playing for Juventus?

What exactly is the punishment? Deducted points? Fine?

I thought Vargas didn't play for Peru and he wasn't even on the bench due to an injury. So even though he went to Peru and didn't reject the call he still didn't play at the end due to an injury.

Yeah, it's complicated and i don't really know if Vargas' case is the same as Matrix's but why are you trying to take the discussion off it's topic ? The fact is Materazzi was called for the NT and didn't play because he was injured while he played at the weekend after the internationals.
Materazzi didn't say that he retires from the NT so we can't play that card here. FIGC and no-one else has no power to force a player not to retire or to ban him somehow if he retires. That's completely different case with Matrix's.

Although, we can't claim that Materazzi faked an injury. Camoranesi played last Sunday and he will play on Saturday but if he was called for the NT this Wednesday he couldn't have played, right?
Nothing wrong here, but if he was called for the NT and he didn't play he mustn't be been fielded against Roma. That's the rule.
Materazzi broke the rule, it's as simple as that.

 

[Amaurisimo]

Your last post was warned because i think i was clear when i asked you not to go off topic with the discussion about Turk.


I thought Vargas didn't play for Peru and he wasn't even on the bench due to an injury. So even though he went to Peru and didn't reject the call he still didn't play at the end due to an injury.

Yeah, it's complicated and i don't really know if Vargas' case is the same as Matrix's but why are you trying to take the discussion off it's topic ? The fact is Materazzi was called for the NT and didn't play because he was injured while he played at the weekend after the internationals.
Materazzi didn't say that he retires from the NT so we can't play that card here. FIGC and no-one else has no power to force a player not to retire or to ban him somehow if he retires. That's completely different case with Matrix's.

Although, we can't claim that Materazzi faked an injury. Camoranesi played last Sunday and he will play on Saturday but if he was called for the NT this Wednesday he couldn't have played, right?
Nothing wrong here, but if he was called for the NT and he didn't play he mustn't be been fielded against Roma. That's the rule.
Materazzi broke the rule, it's as simple as that.

so what is punishment for this?