Comparing Appiah to Tacch is something like
comparing Roy Keane to Quinton Fortune.
makes no sense for me.
Tacch is a very useful player, he obviously needs a better partner than himself, but he is reliable, tough, usually good enough to "terrorize" the midfield (not as much as Keane did on his days).
To be very positive, I call Appiah a prospect, may will be a good offensive player, but sure not the worker type, so if his "magic" dont work, he cannot compensate it by winning balls, making runs or things like that.
comparing Roy Keane to Quinton Fortune.
makes no sense for me.
Tacch is a very useful player, he obviously needs a better partner than himself, but he is reliable, tough, usually good enough to "terrorize" the midfield (not as much as Keane did on his days).
To be very positive, I call Appiah a prospect, may will be a good offensive player, but sure not the worker type, so if his "magic" dont work, he cannot compensate it by winning balls, making runs or things like that.
