Avatars (1 Viewer)

OP

Layce Erayce

Senior Member
Aug 11, 2002
9,116
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #7
    yeah but the other forums have bigger avatars and they look sexy. plus i cant make funk-ass animations with the size limitations
     

    gray

    Senior Member
    Moderator
    Apr 22, 2003
    30,141
    #9
    I'm pretty sure they can, but the powers that be choose to keep them this size. The worst thing that can happen to a forum, though, is not setting restrictions for avatar sizes, so people can completely fsck up the table sizes with extra-wide or extra-long avatars. Letting people post huge signature banners looks terrible too. Just look at the milan forums :yuck:
     

    mikhail

    Senior Member
    Jan 24, 2003
    9,576
    #12
    Bah! They're grand as they are. The bigger they get, the longer each page takes to load, so I'm damned if I want to see Josh's attempts to knock Spielberg off the top in 100x100 pixels. Some people here don't need any more encouragement.
     
    OP

    Layce Erayce

    Senior Member
    Aug 11, 2002
    9,116
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #15
    ++ [ originally posted by mikhail ] ++
    Bah! They're grand as they are. The bigger they get, the longer each page takes to load, so I'm damned if I want to see Josh's attempts to knock Spielberg off the top in 100x100 pixels. Some people here don't need any more encouragement.
    well the avatars are saved on your computer so therefore they shouldnt take long to load. it loads from your computer.
     

    gray

    Senior Member
    Moderator
    Apr 22, 2003
    30,141
    #16
    ++ [ originally posted by Josh ] ++

    well the avatars are saved on your computer so therefore they shouldnt take long to load. it loads from your computer.
    My concern isn't the loading times. Signature banners are FUGLY
     

    gray

    Senior Member
    Moderator
    Apr 22, 2003
    30,141
    #18
    ++ [ originally posted by Josh ] ++
    nobody is talking about signature banners here you twit!!
    Is that so?

    ++ [ originally posted by Graham ] ++
    Letting people post huge signature banners looks terrible too
    ++ [ originally posted by Vilhelmas ] ++
    100x100 wouldnt be that bad. and i hail martin for not allowing banners for signatures.
    ++ [ originally posted by sallyinzaghi ] ++
    Signatures with banners are the worst
    ++ [ originally posted by SarajMan ] ++
    I agree with you sally

    Sure as hell looks like it to me... TWIT!
     

    Gandalf

    Senior Member
    Jul 28, 2003
    2,038
    #19
    I think what josh meant is that the main subject was avatars, sig banners was a related essue.. actually he was talking about avatars before you mentioned sig banners..

    ++ [ originally posted by Graham ] ++

    ++ [ originally posted by Josh ] ++
    well the avatars are saved on your computer so therefore they shouldnt take long to load. it loads from your computer.
    My concern isn't the loading times. Signature banners are FUGLY
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)