Arturo Vidal - DM - Bayer Leverkusen (29 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
#749
Mar 16, 2004
116,135
#749
Alen said:
I'd hate it if we plan to use Vidal as Pirlo's bodyguard. I only watched the first half yesterday and Chile's coach gave him strictly defensive duties from what I could notice. He can do that job, but I'm not sure if he can do it much better or any better at all than some of the guys we already have.
He must be given more freedom if you want to get the best out of him.
Click to expand...
Yes, correct. We'd want him as the box to box player. Those who keep pushing this whole Marchisio - Pirlo - Vidal midfield are not paying attention. Vidal would be the roaming midfielder. We need a stay at home DM in there.
 
Flamez

Flamez

Senior Member
#753
Feb 7, 2011
1,991
#753
Bjerknes said:
Yes, correct. We'd want him as the box to box player. Those who keep pushing this whole Marchisio - Pirlo - Vidal midfield are not paying attention. Vidal would be the roaming midfielder. We need a stay at home DM in there.
Click to expand...
Like Argentina's Banega (Pirlo) - Mascherano (DM) - Cambiasso (Vidal)? Yeah right.

Marchisio and Vidal would compensate each other. One goes up, another stays low on the pitch. They could easily mix some movements because they're similar players and can do many roles in the midfield.
 
The Curr

The Curr

Senior Member
#754
Feb 3, 2007
33,705
#754
Flamez said:
Like Argentina's Banega (Pirlo) - Mascherano (DM) - Cambiasso (Vidal)? Yeah right.

Marchisio and Vidal would compensate each other. One goes up, another stays low on the pitch. They could easily mix some movements because they're similar players and can do many roles in the midfield.
Click to expand...
I agree. Vidal and Marchisio are both good players to have in a team with Pirlo. You need players that will move, not sit beside Pirlo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 24)