Giving all the credit to Leekens? IMO the credit needs to be given to Advocaat.
Both deserve credit, but leekens did more then Advocaat
what is wrong with wilmots? he got you guys to qf of the world cup?
We had the easyest group and scraped trough, had the easyest team in the quarterfinals, and lost like a bunch of kids to argentina.
IMO, nothing much wrong with Wilmots, but for some reason, zach doesn't like him.
I want to give him credit until after EC2016. He made some strange choices during the WC (f.e. not using Januzaj much but using Chadli or Dembele) but all in all, I think he did OK for his first big test as coach.
Although he might have been a bit to defensive during the WC.
Oh thats not true. Wilmots just motivates the players, puts on a formation, and doesnt do tactics, at all. Borkelmans does those, but he's pretty limited in that regard.
Truth is that especially in the groupstage, it was awfull to watch how we totally lacked a tactical plan, players running in each others way etc.
Against argentina it was most clear. They so incredibly easely kept us from making a single meaningfull attack all game, whilst at the same time they had 5 big chances before the goal.
WIlmots, is a motivator, with shit tactical knowledge. Nothing at all.
He will win three world cups in a row!
Mister

!
You mean the germans wil
thanks ches that
is just zach whom doesn't like him. I want to meet you guys in the euros final
Many analysts in belgium, and many other people have been very critical about Wilmots, and its generally seen that our team is significantly held back by his tactical limitations