Antonio Conte (138 Viewers)

[Lapa]

When will we hear the verdict?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Juventino[RUS]]

first, conte is a current juve's head coach... so de facto or de jure it's juve's problem too
second, so now you suggest conte cheated? while all over the news they said the charge is only for 'failing to report'? seriously, BAN THIS GUY!!!

de facto it's our problem, de juro it's not, that's it. Since he agreed the bargain it's means that he is guilty more or less

 

[napoleonic]

I don't think so

---------- Post added 01.08.2012 at 20:09 ----------



This process have nothing with Juventus, when all of you will understand it? Now you tell me why did Conte has accepted bargain? why the hell he is not fightin to stay innocent ?

if you are threatened with 'guilty until proven innocent' while you know there's no way to prove you are innocent, what will you do? fighting for the innocence will just result in actual worse impact than simply admitting guilt seriously I think you deserved to get banned for insisting that conte is guilty while it's clearly not, that's way more insulting than just saying fuck you to him.

 

[Gian]

When will we hear the verdict?

Tomorrow.

 

[piotrr]

fuck that shit and place some replacement on the bench, and have conte texting him

We should have kept Elia.

 

[KB824]

Let me see if I get this straight, adn someone plese correct me if I am wrong.

The plea bargain that was agreed upon by Conte and the prosecutor was a 3 month ban and a 200,000 euro fine.

In the agreement, Conte would be able to train the players, organize a gameplan for the matches, and basically do everything except for being in the stadium on matchday.

This was summarily rejected by the judge.


Did I get this right?

 

[juve901]

When will we hear the verdict?

That's difficult to say. Right now reports are suggesting the defendant (Conte) and the prosecutors are trying to negotiate another plea bargain before the trial - which Red has reported is tomorrow. If they cannot reach an agreement with the prosecutor(s) on a plea bargain, it will just go to trial. If it goes to trial, it's impossible to say how long it will take for a verdict to be concluded. Some suggest sporting trials are 'shorter' than regular trials, but there's no way to say how long this process could take. First thing is to hope they can reach a plea bargain that allows Conte to at least train the squad.

 

[Lapa]

Does somebody actually even care if he has cheated in the past? Not that I would even believe it.

 

[Djabrail]

Juve is an italian club, always was, always will be. FIGS can move to France or wherever they want for all i care, but Juve is an Italys pride.

 

[Juventino[RUS]]

if you are threatened with 'guilty until proven innocent' while you know there's no way to prove you are innocent, what will you do? fighting for the innocence will just result in actual worse impact than simply admitting guilt seriously I think you deserved to get banned for insisting that conte is guilty while it's clearly not, that's way more insulting than just saying fuck you to him.

It's about law, do you realize it? There is a law in Italy - if you know that someone is matchfixing you should make a report on them, if you will not do it and then someone will announce that you knew about that matchfixing had a place you are in trouble, it's a L-A-W and you will take a responsibility for ur silence, is it fucking hard to understand it?

 

[Klin]

Anyone cares to summarize what happened today please?

 

[Lapa]

That's difficult to say. Right now reports are suggesting the defendant (Conte) and the prosecutors are trying to negotiate another plea bargain before the trial - which Red has reported is tomorrow. If they cannot reach an agreement with the prosecutor(s) on a plea bargain, it will just go to trial. If it goes to trial, it's impossible to say how long it will take for a verdict to be concluded. Some suggest sporting trials are 'shorter' than regular trials, but there's no way to say how long this process could take. First thing is to hope they can reach a plea bargain that allows Conte to at least train the squad.

Thanks for this. +rep.

 

[juve901]

Let me see if I get this straight, adn someone plese correct me if I am wrong.

The plea bargain that was agreed upon by Conte and the prosecutor was a 3 month ban and a 200,000 euro fine.

In the agreement, Conte would be able to train the players, organize a gameplan for the matches, and basically do everything except for being in the stadium on matchday.

This was summarily rejected by the judge.


Did I get this right?

yes

 

[Roman]

Let me see if I get this straight, adn someone plese correct me if I am wrong.

The plea bargain that was agreed upon by Conte and the prosecutor was a 3 month ban and a 200,000 euro fine.

In the agreement, Conte would be able to train the players, organize a gameplan for the matches, and basically do everything except for being in the stadium on matchday.

This was summarily rejected by the judge.


Did I get this right?

Yes.and now they try to make a new bargain deal.one that the FIGC will approve and accept.if no deal found then tommorow will be the trial,wich will decide if he's guilty or not and then he'll get the full punishment 6-12 months suspension.
So they trying to find something in between...4months maybe...i don't know.

 

[AFL_ITALIA]

Anyone cares to summarize what happened today please?

Conte's plea was rejected.

 

[Klin]

Conte's plea was rejected.

Fuck.

 

[Red]

Let me see if I get this straight, adn someone plese correct me if I am wrong.

The plea bargain that was agreed upon by Conte and the prosecutor was a 3 month ban and a 200,000 euro fine.

In the agreement, Conte would be able to train the players, organize a gameplan for the matches, and basically do everything except for being in the stadium on matchday.

This was summarily rejected by the judge.


Did I get this right?

Yup.

Anyone cares to summarize what happened today please?

Nothing, really.

Negotiations are still ongoing regarding a possible plea bargain for Conte.

 

[swag]

Does somebody actually even care if he has cheated in the past? Not that I would even believe it.

I do, actually.

 

[X Æ A-12]

Does somebody actually even care if he has cheated in the past? Not that I would even believe it.

Not one bit

 

[Red]

Could some kind person explain this, please:

18.10 — La Commissione Disciplinare accetta le proposte di Palazzi, che non farà richieste di condanna per Conte (e anche Alessio e Garlini) per non inficiare un possibile patteggiamento.

http://www.gazzetta.it/Calcio/Calci...ri-insulti-contro-palazzi--912066008377.shtml

I put it through a translator, but was still struggling to get my head round it.