Antonio Conte (108 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Tags goat coach
It will be fast, as this isnt actually a real trial.
People need to remember that this is all going on outside the italian justice system and that the FIGC is not a part of the italian state. It is an independant association which has its members (clubs, players, coaches, etc) and which organizes certain activities (football) and which has its own rules and regulations that its members are bound by.
So this "trial" is not a trial in the sense of a criminal procedure or a civilc ase infront of a real judge, its more of a disciplinary proceeding whereby the association bans your membership privileges you could say. Closest analogy would be a lawyer getting disbarred or geting his licence suspended.
What do you define as 'fast' ? A trial is a trial. This is not an arbitration as what you are describing. FIGC is not an 'independent' organization. FIGC is a governing body that is a member organization of UEFA and FIFA and all their trials and procedures have to be in tantem with the requirements of those two bodies [which we all know sometime seem almost more complicated than national governments]. Additionally, they're subject to review by those bodies, as well as the Italian government's own Sporting Justice Commission. I totally get what you're saying, as this won't be a 5-year trial and less complicated. But I wouldn't make assumptions as there's more red tape than you think. We just have to play it by ear. I think it depends what information was devulged during the last meeting which will affect how long this trial will/would be.
We can't stop them from participating even in a friendly played during the UEFA/FIFA scheduled days for friendlies. We are actually obligated NOT to prevent our players from playing for the NT if called. If we do it then we'll be banned from playing european competitions.
We can do it only if our players retire from the NT, but good luck convincing them to do that.
We can do it only if our players retire from the NT, but good luck convincing them to do that.
Conte would still be doing the same thing Mourinho does during his frequent touchline bans. He'll be training the team, choose the line-ups and he'll surely be on the phone all the time with someone on the bench.
It's just that his figure will be missing from the touchline. That's just a minor handicap.
It's just that his figure will be missing from the touchline. That's just a minor handicap.
Don't know where to put this, but silenzio stampa
http://www.juventus.com/juve/it/news/Silenzio+stampa
http://www.juventus.com/juve/it/news/Silenzio+stampa
I dont think its a real trial, it is more like a disciplinary proceeding you would have in a professional association or an arbitration.
It is an independant body in the sense that it is not a part of the Italian state or an official state body. And the proceedings are not being held in the regular italian court system but in the FIGC's "judicial" system.
---------- Post added 01.08.2012 at 20:20 ----------
Getting damages. Like I said, this trial is outside the regular judicial system and hence an appeal to the civil courts wouldnt actually be a direct appeal to the sentence but more of a lawsuit for violation of certain rights.
It is an independant body in the sense that it is not a part of the Italian state or an official state body. And the proceedings are not being held in the regular italian court system but in the FIGC's "judicial" system.
---------- Post added 01.08.2012 at 20:20 ----------
Getting damages. Like I said, this trial is outside the regular judicial system and hence an appeal to the civil courts wouldnt actually be a direct appeal to the sentence but more of a lawsuit for violation of certain rights.
