Antonio Conte (171 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Tags goat coach
![Juventino[RUS]](https://www.juventuz.com/data/avatars/s/5/5409.jpg?1650619365){kind=avatar}
I don't know FIGC's ruling. No one does as they have not made a ruling yet. A ruling is what Juventus and Conte's lawyers are trying to avoid. It is not my opinion, I'm just stating the facts as I know them to be right now.
Again, I did an in-depth post about all this a page or two back and won't re-type it all. If you have a moment, look into it. At this point, the defendants, including Conte, put in Plea Bargain proposals that includes a 'ban' that is of their terms, and that of which allows them to train the team. This is not be confused with a 'real official ban' which is defined, obviously differently, by FIGC Rules, which is in compliance with FIFA Ethics Rules.
This 'ban' of 3 months which allows Conte to train the team is part of a plea bargain that is of Conte's terms (and previously assumed to have been agreed to by the prosecutors). This is not an 'official ban' as defined by the FIGC or in any way a part of their definition of the term and sentencing of a Ban. According to FIFA and FIGC's rules the coach or player cannot take part “in any kind of football-related activity at national and international level for a defined period". That is why Juventus and Conte's lawyers want to avoid a trial so as not to be in danger of any length of a ban that excludes him totally from the club in every way.
Again, I did an in-depth post about all this a page or two back and won't re-type it all. If you have a moment, look into it. At this point, the defendants, including Conte, put in Plea Bargain proposals that includes a 'ban' that is of their terms, and that of which allows them to train the team. This is not be confused with a 'real official ban' which is defined, obviously differently, by FIGC Rules, which is in compliance with FIFA Ethics Rules.
This 'ban' of 3 months which allows Conte to train the team is part of a plea bargain that is of Conte's terms (and previously assumed to have been agreed to by the prosecutors). This is not an 'official ban' as defined by the FIGC or in any way a part of their definition of the term and sentencing of a Ban. According to FIFA and FIGC's rules the coach or player cannot take part “in any kind of football-related activity at national and international level for a defined period". That is why Juventus and Conte's lawyers want to avoid a trial so as not to be in danger of any length of a ban that excludes him totally from the club in every way.
That was gold.![Juventino[RUS]](https://www.juventuz.com/data/avatars/m/5/5409.jpg?1650619365){kind=avatar}
But we don't know what did he say to prosecutor, right? so i can't jugde, of course Juventus is like red rag for the bull, since they are having opportunity to pierce us they will do it instantly that's why we should be very very careful with everything. IF you want my opinion - if Conte is really not guilty he should fight til' the end for his innocence
just to clarify :
"4 month ban" means :
4 months, no coaching from sideline, not allowed in lockerroom or near players during games, not allowed to hold press conferences, regarding the team
however, handeling day to day training is allowed
fuck that shit and place some replacement on the bench, and have conte texting him
"4 month ban" means :
4 months, no coaching from sideline, not allowed in lockerroom or near players during games, not allowed to hold press conferences, regarding the team
however, handeling day to day training is allowed
fuck that shit and place some replacement on the bench, and have conte texting him
