Antonio Conte (147 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Tags goat coach
Tell them to F**K OFF and take them to the real courts.
No! I would accept nothing less than FIGc being fined a million Euros for fixing the league in favour of the 2 Milan clubs, a life ban for Palazzi and a life (jail) sentence each for that ASSH*LE GC Abete and his sidekick Ferramosca.
Quite right too!
No! Surely they cannot apply a ban until he is proved guilty. That can take years in Italian courts.
That rule has been enforced since Abete and Ferramosca were put in charge of FIGc by moRATti.
Aka MoRATti's boyfriends.
Yeah! We could also petition FIFA to Ban the two clubs who profit by FIGc;s bias against Juve: - Milan and
We could also petition FIFA to ban the Italian National Team until moRATti's b*tches resign.
The only 'proof' the have on Conte 'knowing' about match-fixing is carrobio's word; - the word of a match fixer!
Take FIGc to the real courts - and carrobio too! Sue them both!
No! I would accept nothing less than FIGc being fined a million Euros for fixing the league in favour of the 2 Milan clubs, a life ban for Palazzi and a life (jail) sentence each for that ASSH*LE GC Abete and his sidekick Ferramosca.
Quite right too!
No! Surely they cannot apply a ban until he is proved guilty. That can take years in Italian courts.
That rule has been enforced since Abete and Ferramosca were put in charge of FIGc by moRATti.
Aka MoRATti's boyfriends.
Yeah! We could also petition FIFA to Ban the two clubs who profit by FIGc;s bias against Juve: - Milan and
We could also petition FIFA to ban the Italian National Team until moRATti's b*tches resign. The only 'proof' the have on Conte 'knowing' about match-fixing is carrobio's word; - the word of a match fixer!
Take FIGc to the real courts - and carrobio too! Sue them both!
I see what you're saying. But being a lawyer, I can clarify that a plea bargain is a proposal by the defendant to the prosecutor or judge. In Conte's case, he's pleading 'not guilty' to the charges but in return for a shorter sentence than if he is found guilty and given a 1 yr ban, he is offering those terms you described above (the bargain). He pleads not guilty, but concedes a short-term ban and a fine given to charity.
This plea bargain is given as a proposal by the defendant to the prosecutor and/or judge, and then they discuss it, and if possible agree on it and move ahead with it. It appears that those terms were agreed upon by the prosecutors, but in a bizarre move, the judges then rejected it. That's why everyone is freaking out and Juve are opting to move the judges off the case as an obstruction against an already agreed upon plea bargain by the defendant and prosecutor.
Since the plea bargain has been rejected - it is up to the judge(s) to decide the 'punishment'. Whatever they decide, Conte has no part in, and could only appeal for a shorter sentence at a later time. An appeal process would be lengthy and his ban would most likely be over before he gets an appeal trial. The only other option is they discuss another plea bargain and try to come to agreement on that.
This plea bargain is given as a proposal by the defendant to the prosecutor and/or judge, and then they discuss it, and if possible agree on it and move ahead with it. It appears that those terms were agreed upon by the prosecutors, but in a bizarre move, the judges then rejected it. That's why everyone is freaking out and Juve are opting to move the judges off the case as an obstruction against an already agreed upon plea bargain by the defendant and prosecutor.
Since the plea bargain has been rejected - it is up to the judge(s) to decide the 'punishment'. Whatever they decide, Conte has no part in, and could only appeal for a shorter sentence at a later time. An appeal process would be lengthy and his ban would most likely be over before he gets an appeal trial. The only other option is they discuss another plea bargain and try to come to agreement on that.
![Juventino[RUS]](https://www.juventuz.com/data/avatars/m/5/5409.jpg?1650619365){kind=avatar}
![Juventino[RUS]](https://www.juventuz.com/data/avatars/s/5/5409.jpg?1650619365){kind=avatar}
.....
The 10+ Siena players are 10+ in favour of Conte compared to one corrupt corrobio against him.
The current FIGc board have continually brought shame to Italy, Italian & European football! For Palazzi??? He should be hung, drawn and quartered!
3 months and 250000 and we have a deal. Or 4 months total, to include Alessio's time as well.
Yes the new plea bargain can still contain elements of the original, with exceptions being a longer term, and, say, pleading 'guilty' to the charges instead of 'not guilty'. But we'll have to see what the judge(s) were looking for. It's unsual that they rejected the plea bargain, so they must be looking for something else or had some kind of reason to do so. It's hard to tell.
Any ruling of a ban would be more severe than any plea bargain terms. Any normal ban could be that Conte is excluded from all footballing activities from 3 to 12 months.
IMO, they'll try to renegotiate another plea bargain, as both sides I don't think would prefer this to go to trial - but you never know with the FIGC, they might prefer a trial (hence, rejecting the plea bargain).
Any ruling of a ban would be more severe than any plea bargain terms. Any normal ban could be that Conte is excluded from all footballing activities from 3 to 12 months.
IMO, they'll try to renegotiate another plea bargain, as both sides I don't think would prefer this to go to trial - but you never know with the FIGC, they might prefer a trial (hence, rejecting the plea bargain).
