Antonio Conte (141 Viewers)

[Quetzalcoatl]

Mmm, okay.

So what about non-sporting legal implications, why don't they have to face the actual courts for these allegations?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Red]

Mauri wasn't charged.

After all the fuss and publicity around his arrest, there was enough evidence against him to bring any sort of case.

 

[icemaη]

Mauri wasn't charged.

After all the fuss and publicity around his arrest, there was enough evidence against him to bring any sort of case.

Same with Criscito I suppose?

 

[Red]

Mmm, okay.

So what about non-sporting legal implications, why don't they have to face the actual courts for these allegations?

Completely separate investigation with different standards of evidence and proof and everything.

Folk may or may not, in due time, also have to face ordinary justice.

---------- Post added 28.07.2012 at 22:22 ----------

Same with Criscito I suppose?

Not entirely sure what's going on with him.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

 

[JCK]

I said IF found guilty. Unlike many others I can at least admit that I don't know what actually happened, others just speak out of their ass. And no, I don't like FIGC and I actually talked shit about them many times and I was always against Calciopoli and everything. But some people are just too much, if some Juve player was accused murderer I bet some here would say 'oh come on, he didn't do it, he wouldn't kill a fly'. That's just BS. Is FIGS retarded? Yes, but people talk too much when they have no idea what happened. Many similar things happened here when it comes to betting scandal, big guys are always on the fire so justice system would look 'strong'.

Truer words have never been said.

 

[j0ker]

Individuals charged with failing to report an attempted sporting fraud: Simone Pepe, Guido Angelozzi (former Bari director of sport), Simone Bentivoglio, Marco Di Vaio, Angelo Da Costa Junior, Antonio Conte (ex-Siena Coach), Angelo Alessio (ex-Siena assistant manager), Marco Savorani (ex-Siena goalkeeping coach), Marcello Sanfelice (Bologna team manager), Bortolo Mutti (ex-Bari Coach) and Giorgio D’Urbano (ex-Siena fitness coach)

What will happen to him now that he joined Montreal?

It's so confusing.

 

[Trequartista]

What will happen to him now that he joined Montreal?

Nothing, I guess. A fine perhaps?

 

[Joe]

What will we do if both Conte and Alessio are banned?

 

[Ahmed]

What will happen to him now that he joined Montreal?

It's so confusing.

should show up if he gets indicted.

 

[j0ker]

Nothing, I guess. A fine perhaps?

We were discussing about Bonucci's potential ban the other day, some were suggesting that we could just sell him to Russia, I'm sure that the ban will apply for every league recongnized by UEFA / FIFA.

---------- Post added 28.07.2012 at 23:49 ----------

should show up if he gets indicted.

What if he gets a ban? Will he be able to play in MLS?

 

[Ahmed]

---------- Post added 29.07.2012 at 01:51 ----------

What if he gets a ban? Will he be able to play in MLS?

doubt it, one would expect bans to work across all FIFA-registered football leagues and associations.

 

[j0ker]

---------- Post added 29.07.2012 at 01:51 ----------



doubt it, one would expect bans to work across all FIFA-registered football leagues and associations.

That's what I thought.

 

[Lion]

I said IF found guilty. Unlike many others I can at least admit that I don't know what actually happened, others just speak out of their ass. And no, I don't like FIGC and I actually talked $#@! about them many times and I was always against Calciopoli and everything. But some people are just too much, if some Juve player was accused murderer I bet some here would say 'oh come on, he didn't do it, he wouldn't kill a fly'. That's just BS. Is FIGS retarded? Yes, but people talk too much when they have no idea what happened. Many similar things happened here when it comes to betting scandal, big guys are always on the fire so justice system would look 'strong'.

straw man argument.

first of all being accused of murder is different than a betting scandal. different circumstances. and yes until the evidence proves that the player did it, i would say that he is innocent. that's what evidence is there for.

second of all, being accused of something is different than being convicted for the crime. van persie was accused of sexual assault. why is he not in prison? because evidence proved that he didn't do it.

in the case of this sporting trail, the bullshit is that conte has to prove he is innocent. do you understand how difficult this is? especially when the judge had deemed that the word of one man is more valuable than the word of many.

third, figc has proven in the past that there is a unfairness in serving out so called punishments and trials, making them unreliable as far as prosecutors go.

 

[Trequartista]

straw man argument.

first of all being accused of murder is different than a betting scandal. different circumstances. and yes until the evidence proves that the player did it, i would say that he is innocent. that's what evidence is there for.

second of all, being accused of something is different than being convicted for the crime. van persie was accused of sexual assault. why is he not in prison? because evidence proved that he didn't do it.

in the case of this sporting trail, the bullshit is that conte has to prove he is innocent. do you understand how difficult this is? especially when the judge had deemed that the word of one man is more valuable than the word of many.

third, figc has proven in the past that there is a unfairness in serving out so called punishments and trials, making them unreliable as far as prosecutors go.

Completely agreed.

 

[Fake Melo]

straw man argument.

first of all being accused of murder is different than a betting scandal. different circumstances. and yes until the evidence proves that the player did it, i would say that he is innocent. that's what evidence is there for.

second of all, being accused of something is different than being convicted for the crime. van persie was accused of sexual assault. why is he not in prison? because evidence proved that he didn't do it.

in the case of this sporting trail, the bullshit is that conte has to prove he is innocent. do you understand how difficult this is? especially when the judge had deemed that the word of one man is more valuable than the word of many.

third, figc has proven in the past that there is a unfairness in serving out so called punishments and trials, making them unreliable as far as prosecutors go.

I'd love to see one of these guys in the same situation as Conte.

 

[Klovn]

What will we do if both Conte and Alessio are banned?

Primavera coach steps in.

 

[Lion]

calcipoli wiretaps came out in may when juve was pretty serie a winners.

the trial barely lasted a few months, as the mighty figc was quick to dish out "justice"

this whole corruption charges against conte, bonucci, and pepe has been known for more than a year now no?

convenient that NOW they choose to prosecute juve memebers on the heel of the league win

 

[The Pado]

Actually, the FIGC's Calciopoli trial lasted no more than 2 weeks. A time frame that makes it impossible for the judges to have heard the one million plus recordings presented. As a lawyer, it offends me that this is even called a "trial". This was a "Sentencing" based on what newspapers reported. As for the betting, we'll have to see if the FIGC has learned from their criminal past.

 

[Lion]

Actually, the FIGC's Calciopoli trial lasted no more than 2 weeks. A time frame that makes it impossible for the judges to have heard the one million plus recordings presented. As a lawyer, it offends me that this is even called a "trial". This was a "Sentencing" based on what newspapers reported. As for the betting, we'll have to see if the FIGC has learned from their criminal past.

how the hell were those wiretaps even legal