It's funny how often reality becomes altered when a point is trying to be made.
If we lose the scudetto by a non-penalty on the final matchday then perceptions would change, but in reality there are all as important.
It's not really about Pirlo's penalty or those in the Parma game, they weren't 100% penalties so on their own you can decide either way. It's the consistency of non-penalties for Juve over the season. Add a direct contrast with Milan and of course it becomes an issue, it's ok being moralistic about it but at some point when it happens over and over you have to say something, or it keeps on happening.
Donadoni can stick his Milanista view up his ass to be honest. I can find a dozen examples of Galliani blaming the referee after a game, and twice as many showing how Milan have benefited from soft penalties in the following games. That's the influence they have, as a big club with big fingers in every pie.
If we sit and be quiet every week we will continue to be turned over by officials, nothing is given in Italy without a word. The club can go about it in a classier way than ranting in a post match interview, but essentially you are saying the same thing; 'why are we not being treated equally?' If you are for inequality in sport then maybe silence is for you. Frankly, having followed Italian football for so long I'm sick of it. If you want to create tier systems in calcio then there is no reason why Milan should be alone at the top.