Palazzi : " The telephone call is proven , althrough there is no evidentiary material "
So if i say that palazzi is a pedophile and a tax evader , but there is no evidentary material , do they condemn palazzi ?
Palazzi " The telephone call is proven , althrough there is no evidentiary material "
So if i say that palazzi is a pedophile and a tax evader , do they condemn palazzi ?
Palazzi : " The telephone call is proven , althrough there is no evidentiary material "
So if i say that palazzi is a pedophile and a tax evader , but there is no evidentary material , do they condemn palazzi ?