I fail to see how you can be so emotionally detached to all of this. I know it's not the end of the world but do you deny the fact how much of an impact it would be on the club if Conte gets suspended?
Buy on AliExpress.com
Antonio Conte (73 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Tags goat coach
Buy on AliExpress.com
That is the point there is no evidence . In a civil court when there is no evidence you are found innocent , in sports justice if you can't prove your innocence (which is almost impossible) you are found guilty . Still , this is how sports justice works , so up to this point we may hate it , but it is right according to justice .
The point is that this whole thing is based on the testimony of someone who is not reliable at all and the inequality of judging what he says . If they accuse conte being guilty for Omitted denounce that means that everybody else that carobbio accused is guilty for the same as well . Which means that all the players of siena and mezzaroma should get the same , but they didn't . That pratically means that palazzi believes only a part of what carobbio says which in itself is absurd . Either you believe him or you don't , you can't believe only the parts you want to believe , if you believe that he is lying about something than in that moment you are questioning the reliability of carobbio making everything else he has said unreliable , which normally would make the whole process go down and everybody accused by carobbio will be considered innocent .
Palazzi
---------- Post added 27.07.2012 at 13:27 ----------
usually you get 1 year for omitted denounce , if he pleas he will get 4 months
The point is that this whole thing is based on the testimony of someone who is not reliable at all and the inequality of judging what he says . If they accuse conte being guilty for Omitted denounce that means that everybody else that carobbio accused is guilty for the same as well . Which means that all the players of siena and mezzaroma should get the same , but they didn't . That pratically means that palazzi believes only a part of what carobbio says which in itself is absurd . Either you believe him or you don't , you can't believe only the parts you want to believe , if you believe that he is lying about something than in that moment you are questioning the reliability of carobbio making everything else he has said unreliable , which normally would make the whole process go down and everybody accused by carobbio will be considered innocent .
Palazzi
---------- Post added 27.07.2012 at 13:27 ----------
usually you get 1 year for omitted denounce , if he pleas he will get 4 months
I see some people are on their moral high horses. Let me tell you this, I couldn't care less if Conte knew anything. In my book he shouldn't get punished. I am not sure if I would come forward and report match fixing if I was suspecting it as well. If Conte wasn't the Juventus coach, and still was in Serie B, no one would care about this.
I keep coming back to the fact that Preziosi received only a 6 Month ban for actually fixing a match - buying the result from Venezia for cash - and getting caught in the act. How could the FIGC reconcile that 6-Month ban with a similar ban for those who were offered a fix and refused or those who simply didn't report something? Does FIGC not see the difference here?
