Andrea Pirlo (117 Viewers)

vote

  • Legend

  • History


Results are only viewable after voting.

Juliano13

Senior Member
May 6, 2012
5,017
Well Elvin's dreams might still be realized. We're heading down that route of becoming an 'attacking' team but the execution and planning behind it has been plain awful thus far.

Although I still much rather prefer we stick to our roots. But let's see, if Juventus are able to make that successful transition, then why not.
Just because we are shit at the back doesn't mean we are an attacking team. The only thing that's certain is that we are heading down the route of becoming a bad team.
 

Mike-e-y

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2004
11,188
All this talk of either being an attacking team or a defensive team is nonsense really. The reality is a successful team needs to be able to be both, against all levels of opponents. The best teams at present such as Bayern and City know when to sit solid and equally know when to go in for the kill.

Right now we are neither a good attacking team or a good defensive team. In recent history we’ve never been the most deadly attack, particularly against Europe’s elite teams but we’ve had a level of solidity in our defence. Tici & Bozo seem to have chased the attacking improvement under Sarri who then completely revolutionised our defence with zonal marking and we completely lost the old strength that we possessed . Good teams need balance and that’s what we need to address. Pirlo to a degree is picking up the pieces but he’s demonstrated 0 improvement in either department
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,889
It reminds me a bit when Wenger went away from the solid Arsenal unit and tried to make them an "attacking" side, they've suffered ever since. They went away from mentally tough players and focused on soft technical players. Ironically, Ramsey was one of them.

I think we should aim for the prime Madrid way under Zidane, a good physical side capable of playing both on the counter but still had technical individuals to break down teams who sat back.
I don't think so. Mental toughness and being attacking oriented are not mutually exclusive. Prime Arsenal were one of the more entertaining teams in Europe. Henry's stats were incredible at the time. But as you said, they were more well rounded too with guys like Gilberto, Sol Campbell etc.
The problem is in the recruitment. We recruit too many one dimensional pussyfags who might be good technically but need players around them to babysit them. Someone like Arthur might be good at one skillset but poor at everything else. Or for example, ask Bentancur to be a DM and do the dirty work, he'll do that but if you ask him to pull the strings in midfield, he'll look out of his depth.

What we need are players who are more well rounded. A combination of stamina, technique and adaptability.

Hence it's no surprise to see players like Danilo and Chiesa are flourishing under this 'system'.

Not saying this is the absolute truth though. Ofcourse there are many variables that go into what makes a brilliant team. I'm merely trying to analyze the current situation.
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
All this talk of either being an attacking team or a defensive team is nonsense really. The reality is a successful team needs to be able to be both, against all levels of opponents. The best teams at present such as Bayern and City know when to sit solid and equally know when to go in for the kill.

Right now we are neither a good attacking team or a good defensive team. In recent history we’ve never been the most deadly attack, particularly against Europe’s elite teams but we’ve had a level of solidity in our defence. Tici & Bozo seem to have chased the attacking improvement under Sarri who then completely revolutionised our defence with zonal marking and we completely lost the old strength that we possessed . Good teams need balance and that’s what we need to address. Pirlo to a degree is picking up the pieces but he’s demonstrated 0 improvement in either department
:tup:

Unfortunately Sarri turned our defense to shit without improving our attack in the slightest, in fact our attack under Sarri was far more one-dimensional and much worse than our attack was during Allegri’s better seasons.
 

JuelzSantana

Junior Member
Sep 28, 2017
416
I don't think so. Mental toughness and being attacking oriented are not mutually exclusive. Prime Arsenal were one of the more entertaining teams in Europe. Henry's stats were incredible at the time. But as you said, they were more well rounded too with guys like Gilberto, Sol Campbell etc.
The problem is in the recruitment. We recruit too many one dimensional pussyfags who might be good technically but need players around them to babysit them. Someone like Arthur might be good at one skillset but poor at everything else. Or for example, ask Bentancur to be a DM and do the dirty work, he'll do that but if you ask him to pull the strings in midfield, he'll look out of his depth.

What we need are players who are more well rounded. A combination of stamina, technique and adaptability.

Hence it's no surprise to see players like Danilo and Chiesa are flourishing under this 'system'.

Not saying this is the absolute truth though. Ofcourse there are many variables that go into what makes a brilliant team. I'm merely trying to analyze the current situation.
Yes I agree.

In terms of the midfield, my number 1 problem with these players is just basic football IQ. These players don't think the game like the midfielders of the best clubs. They don't know when to make a challenge and when not to. They don't know where to position themselves under pressure, when to release the ball etc. And they're soft mentally on top of that. At City you have a guy like Fernandinho, the guy is a clone of the coach on the pitch. Then you have De Bruyne beside him. Bayern have the same with Kimmich and others. Who do we have? None.

In attack, Chiesa is a good example of a technical player WITH grinta and character. These players are rare though, but a club of our size should be able to pick up more of these profiles. The recruitment has indeed been piss poor.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
88,993
Pirlo should be sacked before we lose top 4. Atalanta and Roma are in great form.
Ain't gonna happen. We didn't sack him until now, we surely won't sack him at this point. He'll stay until the summer surely and hopefully not after.

Not too many matches left to finish the season, I don't think it's a good time to change coach at this point.
 

Strickland

Senior Member
May 17, 2019
5,859
:tup:

Unfortunately Sarri turned our defense to shit without improving our attack in the slightest, in fact our attack under Sarri was far more one-dimensional and much worse than our attack was during Allegri’s better seasons.
Chiellinis injury and decline lead to our defense losing a level or two. As great as de Ligt is, a 20yo from Dutch league can't possibly straightaway be as good as one of the greatest CBs this club has ever had.
 

Amer

Senior Member
Feb 13, 2005
11,302
We used to laugh at Inter and Conte, but fuck it, we are no better at this point. Yes they went out in group stage of CL for 2 straight years, but we also went just one step further. And then we got humiliated by provincial teams like Lyon and Porto.

The saddest thing is that with this guy things will stay the same next year. Without a new coach and new midfield signings I just can't see us do anything in CL, maybe not even in Serie A or Coppa.

Let's not kid ourselves and say next year will be better with this guy.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,760
Yeah it's the fad especially among fans lol.
Some experts get the two mixed up, parking the bus style vs Catennacio..it will mean no shots on goal for us, can't win the CL if we don't score bro!!!!
Maybe it's a fad, maybe it won't go away. If you can do it well it's very difficult to deal with and is a huge advantage.
 
Jan 22, 2016
2,188
I watched the game last night again.
I don't know what to say. We should have won the match 5-1 or 6-1 easily. The amount of chances we threw away were mind blowing. Also Referee robbed us 2 penalties.

I just can not comprehend how we didn't win it. It was like Bayern - Chelsea 2012. Its not like we played shit and didn't create anything.

This was not like Bayern away where we sat down, We destroyed them in the second half totally.

It's easy to scapegoat somebody, but The only explanation is We are just cursed when it comes to CL nights.
 

Elvin

Senior Member
Nov 25, 2005
36,923

- - - Updated - - -



You said 9 out of 10 CL winning teams win it by attack and what instills fear in an opponent is the threat that a team can score at any given minute and defence mindedness hasn't gone far since 2012..Let's see those blistering attacking stats in the finals:


2012- chelsea/Bayern 1-1 defensive match PKs
Shots on target 3/7

2013------bayrn/dortmund 2-1 def approach
Shots on target 8/9

2014----real/atletico 4-1 def approach
1-0 until 90+3 ramos miracle header then 3 goals in ET

2015----Barca/Juve 3-1
We conceded fastest goal in CL history again DEFENCE fuk up cost us we lost before it began

2016--Real/Atletico 1-1 pk's defensive match
Shots on target 8/4

2017---real/Juve 4-1
1-1 halftime. Second half poorly guarded casemiro outside shot broke us. 2-1 Poor defending. Then ronaldo from inside the 6 yard box made it 3-1. Poor defending.

2018---real/livrpol 3-1

2019---livr/toten 2-0.
Salah min 2 penalty, 87 origi

2020-bayern/psg 1-0. Def approach

Out of 9 finals only 4 have had more than 3 goals. (we are the ones that gave up the most goals per match) 4-5 matches out of 9 are legit defensive mentality by both teams..
So the idea of blistering attacks winning CLs is your personal belief and not a fact, the finals could even be said have been more defensive than attack minded or at the very least is split down the middle..Come back to me with numbers and facts not opinions spawn around to sound legit.
Are you for real? Its a final of course there wont be a goal fest. Being attack minded means being pro-active first and foremost. Except the Chelsea win all the rest were won by the proactive team.

Actually thats the term ive been looking for all these past days: proactive vs reactive. The last time Juve was a proactive team in Europe was Lippi's. Also the last time we won in Europe, Allegri 2015 was also relatively proactive but met an even more proactive team in the final and lost.
 

JuveE46

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2015
1,595
Maybe it's a fad, maybe it won't go away. If you can do it well it's very difficult to deal with and is a huge advantage.
Yeah sure it's difficult to deal with if you do it well enough, anything can be a weapon, so can defence if you do it well enough. To say you have to be an all out attacking team for CL or be successful in "modern" game is ignorant.
 

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,760
Yeah sure it's difficult to deal with if you do it well enough, anything can be a weapon, so can defence if you do it well enough. To say you have to be an all out attacking team for CL or be successful in "modern" game is ignorant.
Agreed. I think we need to get with the times though and have a team that can press relentlessly and play at a high tempo when needed, and just be more athletic in general.
 

PhRoZeN

Livin with Mediocre
Mar 29, 2006
16,930
We used to laugh at Inter and Conte, but fuck it, we are no better at this point. Yes they went out in group stage of CL for 2 straight years, but we also went just one step further. And then we got humiliated by provincial teams like Lyon and Porto.

The saddest thing is that with this guy things will stay the same next year. Without a new coach and new midfield signings I just can't see us do anything in CL, maybe not even in Serie A or Coppa.

Let's not kid ourselves and say next year will be better with this guy.

We really dont have to wait till next year. Pirlo has between now and end of the season to show what his worth. One thing he exclaimed few days ago was how he will have more time now to train and work on areas he never got the opportunity too. Well now is his chance.
 

JuveE46

Senior Member
Dec 6, 2015
1,595
Are you for real? Its a final of course there wont be a goal fest. Being attack minded means being pro-active first and foremost. Except the Chelsea win all the rest were won by the proactive team.

Actually thats the term ive been looking for all these past days: proactive vs reactive. The last time Juve was a proactive team in Europe was Lippi's. Also the last time we won in Europe, Allegri 2015 was also relatively proactive but met an even more proactive team in the final and lost.
Nobody said a thing about final being a goal fest. In fact I said it's more defensive approach than attack or even balance. Those numbers I posted doesn't show any one team that won the CL do anything particularly special in attack, just normal matches.

Are YOU for real? You are, NOW that you found the right words.
NOW it makes sense. Proactive vs reactive is a characteristic that can be adjusted per match, that has to do also with intelligence of players and is a good characteristic, that makes sense. it's different to say a team has to be attacking to win a final.
 

Pegi

Senior Member
Feb 22, 2019
1,825
Hasn't done a fucking thing to make this team any better. For one thing i won't blame him is the fact that he got offered for a once in a lifetime job as a completely clueless about how coaching works, but he still took it. Should have done what Xavi does with the Barcelona and actually educating himself about the whole coaching thing and then when he's ready, he let's the board know or maybe their board is more smart to know that he ain't ready yet.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 101)