Scholes (in his prime) was as good as Pirlo, and I'm not saying that because I'm a United fan, but because I'm a football fan and I know a great player when I see him. I don't want to turn this thread into Scholes vs Pirlo, but anyone who says that Scholes is not near the level of Pirlo is either insane or extremely biased towards Pirlo.
The fact that Scholes was United's best player in 2012 speaks for itself, the man is the main reason United finished with as much points as City.
Btw a lot of you on here where against Pirlo joining Juve and labelled him as finished. And I bet half of you didn't rate Pirlo this highly when he was a playing in red and black.
As for replacing Pirlo, as long as Pirlo has fire in him and desire to play you don't have to worry about replacing him for at least 3-4 years. I see no reason why Pirlo can't play till he's 37.
Pirlo's game was never about his pace, and you don't lose your vision, tactical discipline and football intelligence.
The fact that Scholes was United's best player in 2012 speaks for itself, the man is the main reason United finished with as much points as City.
Btw a lot of you on here where against Pirlo joining Juve and labelled him as finished. And I bet half of you didn't rate Pirlo this highly when he was a playing in red and black.
As for replacing Pirlo, as long as Pirlo has fire in him and desire to play you don't have to worry about replacing him for at least 3-4 years. I see no reason why Pirlo can't play till he's 37.
Pirlo's game was never about his pace, and you don't lose your vision, tactical discipline and football intelligence.
