pretty well put summary of the situation:
deepl translation:
In Agnelli's interview there are three important things to consider. If taken and applied to the events of recent months they become facts.
The first is Ceferin's position. In fact, Agnelli frames Ceferin as a connected person who wants to change football and does not do so because he is now too connected to power and the Arab states.
This could explain why Ceferin felt so personally attacked by Agnelli that he lost his head and put Qatar in charge of the ECA.
The second point to consider is when he says 'Many clubs are in favour of a different football landscape, but if you talk to me, agree with me or follow me, you are banned from UEFA'. This shows why everyone is still in the Superleague but publicly is not and makes statements against Agnelli and Juventus.
In practice the system is clear. If you attack Juventus and Agnelli publicly you have UEFA's favour, if you defend Juventus and Agnelli publicly UEFA makes war on you.
The third, perhaps the most important point: 'the Court will not consider the football industry, with an annual turnover of around 50 billion euro and 700,000 jobs involved, as an economic activity, but as a game, an activity based on volunteers playing a game of football'.
Indeed, in recent weeks, all governments are changing winds and going against a more industry and more protected football.
Some examples? Abodi and Gravina saying that the current system does not work and must be changed, the English government creating the carte blanche where it brings football even closer to being run as a business and clubs run in the old way (like a thing between friends) for sale.
You can say anything for matters of supporters or whatever, but Agnelli, Laporta and Perez are changing the system because they are telling the truth, and the truth always angers those who suffer it, and Ceferin and the state clubs (ECA and Bayern Munich) are very angry.
Buy on AliExpress.com
wreaks of NCAA logic
