American NFL Football (125 Viewers)

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
I've changed the kicker scoring now. This is how it was before:


This is the new point system. Basically it's a middle ground between X's scoring system and Yahoo's default point system.
 

acmilan

Plusvalenza Akbar
Nov 8, 2005
10,722
I've changed the kicker scoring now. This is how it was before:


This is the new point system. Basically it's a middle ground between X's scoring system and Yahoo's default point system.
I was gonna suggest lowering the points for field goals even further:
0-19 - 2 pts
20-29 - 2 pts
30-39 - 3 pts
40-49 - 4 pts
50+ - 5 pts

Also, PATs (extra point after a TD) this year will be the equivalent of a 32-33 yard field goal, so we could maybe make it 2 pts as opposed to just 1.

I'd suggest also lowering the points for a TD score by RBs, WRs and TEs to 4 pts (last year we had it at 6 pts). That way we wouldn't be over-emphasizing the importance of a single scoring play over continues production by that player, or other players, in getting his team to the endzone, thus setting up the scoring play. Too many points were scored last year by players who did almost nothing in taking their team to the endzone (or redzone, if you wish) but had a 2-3 yard TD run or catch for that final scoring play.

QBs scores for a TD (passing or running) could still remain 6 pts, like last year, but I'd suggest in that case we increase the penalty pts for interceptions to -2 pts (same as for fumble) as opposed to just -1.
 

Völler

Always spot on
May 6, 2012
23,091
I was gonna suggest lowering the points for field goals even further:
0-19 - 2 pts
20-29 - 2 pts
30-39 - 3 pts
40-49 - 4 pts
50+ - 5 pts

Also, PATs (extra point after a TD) this year will be the equivalent of a 32-33 yard field goal, so we could maybe make it 2 pts as opposed to just 1.

I'd suggest also lowering the points for a TD score by RBs, WRs and TEs to 4 pts (last year we had it at 6 pts). That way we wouldn't be over-emphasizing the importance of a single scoring play over continues production by that player, or other players, in getting his team to the endzone, thus setting up the scoring play. Too many points were scored last year by players who did almost nothing in taking their team to the endzone (or redzone, if you wish) but had a 2-3 yard TD run or catch for that final scoring play.

QBs scores for a TD (passing or running) could still remain 6 pts, like last year, but I'd suggest in that case we increase the penalty pts for interceptions to -2 pts (same as for fumble) as opposed to just -1.
I'll admit you make some good points. But since you annoy me a lot, I've decided to ignore all those points. Thanks for the effort though.
 

GordoDeCentral

Diez
Moderator
Apr 14, 2005
70,876
I was gonna suggest lowering the points for field goals even further:
0-19 - 2 pts
20-29 - 2 pts
30-39 - 3 pts
40-49 - 4 pts
50+ - 5 pts

Also, PATs (extra point after a TD) this year will be the equivalent of a 32-33 yard field goal, so we could maybe make it 2 pts as opposed to just 1.

I'd suggest also lowering the points for a TD score by RBs, WRs and TEs to 4 pts (last year we had it at 6 pts). That way we wouldn't be over-emphasizing the importance of a single scoring play over continues production by that player, or other players, in getting his team to the endzone, thus setting up the scoring play. Too many points were scored last year by players who did almost nothing in taking their team to the endzone (or redzone, if you wish) but had a 2-3 yard TD run or catch for that final scoring play.

QBs scores for a TD (passing or running) could still remain 6 pts, like last year, but I'd suggest in that case we increase the penalty pts for interceptions to -2 pts (same as for fumble) as opposed to just -1.
sounds to me like you want to reward 'losers', the point of fantasy is rewarding players that stand out rather than over-glorifying second tier players i mean why should running 40 yards be the same as scoring which i thought was the purpose of the game. if you want more parity and less drama then go all in and opt for rotisserie type and play in some retirement home, the adequate setting to a game for the faint of heart.


:p but what do i know i aint the commish
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 118)