That is fine. You have your opinion, I have mine.
I'm just glad that the 49ers were not this stupid to make these deals. IF it were for Mariota or Winston? Absolutely. But not for these two. This is simply a product of there being no absolute "sure thing" at QB this year in the draft, and these clubs got desperate
- - - Updated - - -
So, I do have to ask though, what these intangibles are that you see in Carson Wentz
The is never such a thing as a "sure thing", especially when it comes to the QB position in the NFL. That's sort of the point, otherwise there would be no busts and Brady-style shockers in the draft. And the Browns or even the Titans wouldn't trade down either, etc, etc. And yes, I know what you meant by "sure thing" but prospects like Luck/Manning come about once every 20 years anyway.
Every team without a QB is desperate, as they should be, otherwise they wouldn't be trying to get better. Where we differ in opinion is that it's actually worth paying the price for these two prospects. Does that mean both Wentz and Goff, or at least one of them, would become a franchise QB? No, it doesn't, but I think they are worth a shot, something I never said about Winston, for example.
"intangibles", at least to me, mean - natural intelligence, focus, determination, willingness to put in the extra work to get better, attention to detail, etc, etc ... don't care about armstrength (which Wentz has), don't care about accuracy (which he has enough of), don't care about athleticism (which he has too), don't care about win/loss record or level of competition in college or any of that other stuff.
Is Wentz/Goff perfect? No, not by any means but they have everything they need, from a personal perspective, to grow, to improve and become good enough.
Whether either of Wentz or Goff develops into a proper QB, and how quickly in their respective NFL careers, will depend on a number of factors (team environment, coaching, opportunity, etc, etc). What I have been arguing for is that they have the necessary foundation, the right mental make-up for a franchise, which if capable enough, to turn them into at least good-to-very good starting NFL QBs. And that would be enough to warrant the price both the Rams and the Eagles have paid so far.
Either one of those picks that the Titans or the Browns got comes with a certain level of risk, risk that only goes higher as the round does too. If those franchises are smart, really smart at drafting, maybe they get 1 really good and a couple of pretty good players out of that entire "haul" of picks (same would have been for the Rams or Eagles had they kept the picks). But unless one of those players is a QB, it's really not gonna affect the fate of the franchise all that much, big-picture-wise. And that's what makes the risk the Rams and Eagles are taking, worth it, for the circumstances they are stuck in.
- - - Updated - - -
I'd definitely do it. We have the space. Need a top cb. As long as it's not ridiculous money.
exactly why do you think the Panthers did what they did?
Norman will become 29 yo during the '16 season. His performances over the past 2-3 years have created a certain level of expectation when it comes to his 1st big contract in the NFL, and rightfully so. Unfortunately for him, time is catching up and teams, if they are smart, will be very weary of giving him the type of contract he believes he deserves, not at his age, not in the salary-cap era.
For my money, Panthers did the absolute best thing for them, under the circumstances. Norman's next team (which could still be the Panthers, btw) will either get really stupid (e.g the Jets with Revis) and give him the contract he is looking for, or Norman himself will have to reduce his demands/expectations.
- - - Updated - - -
coming form a fan of a team with A-Rod as their QB
