In agreement here as well and something has to give. I don't see jerry loosing that much more and being OK with it.
Buy on AliExpress.com
American NFL Football (92 Viewers)
- Thread starter Torkel
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
Have you seen her lately? She's got ass for weeks. In fact, she wears panties so large that they're not only monogramed with the day-of-the-week on them, but they've got an entire advent calendar. 
Let's put it this way. If I have to trust a QB in a clutch situation with a game on the line, I would trust the 49ers backup QB more than Romo right now.
Let's put it this way. If I have to trust a QB in a clutch situation with a game on the line, I would trust the 49ers backup QB more than Romo right now.
Have you seen her lately? She's got ass for weeks. In fact, she wears panties so large that they're not only monogramed with the day-of-the-week on them, but they've got an entire advent calendar.
Let's put it this way. If I have to trust a QB in a clutch situation with a game on the line, I would trust the 49ers backup QB more than Romo right now.
Let's put it this way. If I have to trust a QB in a clutch situation with a game on the line, I would trust the 49ers backup QB more than Romo right now.
schaub needs to perform better against the pats. hes no peyton manning (obviously dah!) but he shoudnt throw that pick 6 and miss andre johnson in the end zone again.
interesting if texans can maul the pats offensive line. if pats o-line wins the matchup then schaub will have to shit purple elephants to give the texans a chance of winning.
- - - Updated - - -
nope. ponders out. all new qb taking his place.
interesting if texans can maul the pats offensive line. if pats o-line wins the matchup then schaub will have to shit purple elephants to give the texans a chance of winning.
- - - Updated - - -
nope. ponders out. all new qb taking his place.
looking for betting advice or what? 
don't know - their starting QB is out but that means the Pack would be facing a QB they don't know much about and he is known to be a a very athletic runner, so their D better learn fast or could well be caught by surprise. Smart money says the Pack would have finally found a way to limit AP's yardage and the Vikings would fins it tough to keep up with the Pack. 19 pts or less for the Vikings sounds about right to me.
don't know - their starting QB is out but that means the Pack would be facing a QB they don't know much about and he is known to be a a very athletic runner, so their D better learn fast or could well be caught by surprise. Smart money says the Pack would have finally found a way to limit AP's yardage and the Vikings would fins it tough to keep up with the Pack. 19 pts or less for the Vikings sounds about right to me.
true but that was kind of my point - you have to tailor your play-calls to the the strengths of your O and the weaknesses of the opponent's D and look for the miss-matches. The bengals' coaching staff looked dazed and confused as to why an approach that had worked with other teams earlier in the season didn't do much damage tonight.
All the Bengals did today, or at least a good 90% of the time, was look for a big passing play targeting mostly biggish but slow-ish WR downfield, which set up Dalton like a scarecrow for the texans' pass-rush, often got him unsettled and resulted in 3rd and long more often than not. If I tried hard to find an excuse for Lewis and OC, I'd say that Green-Ellis having a hami issue limited their use of a running game to set up the pass and take pressure off Dalton but then again - why not have or use other RBs especially ones with diff characteristics, more suited to running in space. Same goes for smaller-sized, quick slot-WRs.
The Bengals just made themselves too 1-D tonight. All in all, they kept trying the same thing over and over again and seemed surprised that it lead to the same results
Still, kudos to the Texans for coming out with a win after being under so much pressure to perform as a result of their poor form lately.
All the Bengals did today, or at least a good 90% of the time, was look for a big passing play targeting mostly biggish but slow-ish WR downfield, which set up Dalton like a scarecrow for the texans' pass-rush, often got him unsettled and resulted in 3rd and long more often than not. If I tried hard to find an excuse for Lewis and OC, I'd say that Green-Ellis having a hami issue limited their use of a running game to set up the pass and take pressure off Dalton but then again - why not have or use other RBs especially ones with diff characteristics, more suited to running in space. Same goes for smaller-sized, quick slot-WRs.
The Bengals just made themselves too 1-D tonight. All in all, they kept trying the same thing over and over again and seemed surprised that it lead to the same results
Still, kudos to the Texans for coming out with a win after being under so much pressure to perform as a result of their poor form lately.
true but that was kind of my point - you have to tailor your play-calls to the the strengths of your O and the weaknesses of the opponent's D and look for the miss-matches. The bengals' coaching staff looked dazed and confused as to why an approach that had worked with other teams earlier in the season didn't do much damage tonight.
All the Bengals did today, or at least a good 90% of the time, was look for a big passing play targeting mostly biggish but slow-ish WR downfield, which set up Dalton like a scarecrow for the texans' pass-rush, often got him unsettled and resulted in 3rd and long more often than not. If I tried hard to find an excuse for Lewis and OC, I'd say that Green-Ellis having a hami issue limited their use of a running game to set up the pass and take pressure off Dalton but then again - why not have or use other RBs especially ones with diff characteristics, more suited to running in space. Same goes for smaller-sized, quick slot-WRs.
The Bengals just made themselves too 1-D tonight. All in all, they kept trying the same thing over and over again and seemed surprised that it lead to the same results
Still, kudos to the Texans for coming out with a win after being under so much pressure to perform as a result of their poor form lately.
All the Bengals did today, or at least a good 90% of the time, was look for a big passing play targeting mostly biggish but slow-ish WR downfield, which set up Dalton like a scarecrow for the texans' pass-rush, often got him unsettled and resulted in 3rd and long more often than not. If I tried hard to find an excuse for Lewis and OC, I'd say that Green-Ellis having a hami issue limited their use of a running game to set up the pass and take pressure off Dalton but then again - why not have or use other RBs especially ones with diff characteristics, more suited to running in space. Same goes for smaller-sized, quick slot-WRs.
The Bengals just made themselves too 1-D tonight. All in all, they kept trying the same thing over and over again and seemed surprised that it lead to the same results
Still, kudos to the Texans for coming out with a win after being under so much pressure to perform as a result of their poor form lately.
When you have AJ Green on your team, you have to at least try a few times downfield. For my money, the best WR in the AFC
I agree with that ... what I had an issue with was their trying that way too often, not just AJG but the other WRs too. Using Green the way yo mentioned is perfectly fine, actually it's why you have him there in the first place, but that doesn't mean you should make it your only play on offense and make yourself predictable and easy to stop. This approach may well work against certain defenses but not against a pass-rush like the Texans'.
anyways, you rooting for the Vikings or think you guys have the pack's number already?
anyways, you rooting for the Vikings or think you guys have the pack's number already?
I agree with that ... what I had an issue with was their trying that way too often, not just AJG but the other WRs too. Using Green the way yo mentioned is perfectly fine, actually it's why you have him there in the first place, but that doesn't mean you should make it your only play on offense and make yourself predictable and easy to stop. This approach may well work against certain defenses but not against a pass-rush like the Texans'.
anyways, you rooting for the Vikings or think you guys have the pack's number already?
anyways, you rooting for the Vikings or think you guys have the pack's number already?
And I don't mean that in a condescending way. Whomever they play, they play
as the new HC in phily? Anything serious and tangible or still the "talking to several teams" crap?
If you aren't going with a coach with NFL experience, there is always some risk as to how he would handle the transition from college, but apart from that, he is as good a choice as any out there, I guess. He would likely have to make adjustments to how he runs the O but think would be a good fit for the explosive players you already have on the roster, and the other way around too - Philly would be a much better fit for him than say the Browns, imo. Would be interesting what he would do with the QB position if he were to take over at Philly.
If you aren't going with a coach with NFL experience, there is always some risk as to how he would handle the transition from college, but apart from that, he is as good a choice as any out there, I guess. He would likely have to make adjustments to how he runs the O but think would be a good fit for the explosive players you already have on the roster, and the other way around too - Philly would be a much better fit for him than say the Browns, imo. Would be interesting what he would do with the QB position if he were to take over at Philly.
you mean Foles
the thing with kelly at Oregon is that he likes his QB to pose a rushing threat too, which would suggest that Vick might not be completely out of the pic just yet, should Kelly take over that is. I haven't seen much of Foles but he seems to be a pocket-passer of a QB. It's possible that Kelly would go for a diff QB altogether, from FA or the draft, or that he would make some adjustments to his approach on O to accommodate Foles even if I have my doubts he would go with the latter as that would probably be just too big and sudden a change to his approach on offense. Come to think of it, with the success runners like RGIII, Wilson, Kaepernick have had lately in the NFL, I think he will either go with Vick or, if salary is a problem, will try to find a new QB.
the thing with kelly at Oregon is that he likes his QB to pose a rushing threat too, which would suggest that Vick might not be completely out of the pic just yet, should Kelly take over that is. I haven't seen much of Foles but he seems to be a pocket-passer of a QB. It's possible that Kelly would go for a diff QB altogether, from FA or the draft, or that he would make some adjustments to his approach on O to accommodate Foles even if I have my doubts he would go with the latter as that would probably be just too big and sudden a change to his approach on offense. Come to think of it, with the success runners like RGIII, Wilson, Kaepernick have had lately in the NFL, I think he will either go with Vick or, if salary is a problem, will try to find a new QB.