Amauri Carvalho de Oliveira (23 Viewers)

At what cost would you be ok with Amauri?

  • Giovinco + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + cash

  • De Ceglie + Criscito + Giovinco

  • Nocerino + Almiron + Marchionni

  • Almiron + Marchionni + cash

  • Fuck no, don't want him at all

  • Almiron+cash


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

tibike

Senior Member
Dec 11, 2007
1,147
I agree bro, but look at it from Palermo's perspective... why would they settle for 2nd deal while they know that a buffoon is ruling our transfers.
Zamparini, anyone? I mean, come on, that guy would give Amauri for free if he had played terribly against us...

Now, on a serious note, because the asking price is always exaggerated. Just to see if someone is that dumb to pay it.
 

Mafia

Pinturicchio
Jul 21, 2006
1,240
Personally i believe Amauri is not a bad player, but i do not really believe he is a neccessity, as compared to our other sectors of weakness i.e certain defensive and midfield positions, such as CAM for sure. Im not sure that losing out on Palladino and other future prospects to bring in another striker (seeing as Alex and Trez are top class, and we already have Iaquinta as back up) is worth it at all. Especially as everyone knows we are lacking in other departments. I would rather save and splurge on a good CAM and/or LB personally.
 

Joaco

the cronopio
Dec 11, 2005
5,213
If this statement on Goal.com is correct we got Amauri

"The Brazilian striker has been the Bianconeri’s number transfer target for several weeks now.

The Corriere says that Juve sporting director Alessio Secco has agreed with his Palermo counterpart Rino Foschi to sign Amauri for €10.5m plus Antonio Nocerino and Marco Marchionni.

Secco is also said to be toying with the option of including Domenico Criscito as part of the exchange, in order to further lower Amauri’s transfer fee.

Juventus boss Claudio Ranieri is believed to be much happier with this deal, than the original exchange that almost went through.

Secco had reportedly agreed to sign Amauri for €15m plus young starlets Sebastian Giovinco, Paolo De Ceglie and Claudio Marchisio.

Ranieri then vetoed the deal at the last minute, and all three players are now expected to return from their current loan spells to play for Juventus next season.

As for Amauri, he will compete with Alessandro Del Piero, David Trezeguet and Vincenzo Iaquinta for a forward starting berth, with Raffaele Palladino almost certain to be sold in order to make room. "

If this is real secco is starting to get better with sissoko and amauri both coming to juve
I loved that part.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
And for Nocerino -> Average,why did we sell Appiah?

Amauri? hell yes,what a upgrade to Treze this would be...big,strong,capable to do things on his own. I'm tired of people talking bout Treze as big finisher. He can be the biggest finisher in the fckin history but what good of that we have if we cant put him in 100% chance in 90% of games we play?!?! Sell Treze while he's worth something,let him be lazy passive finisher somewhere else......


Funny you think trez is so bad after scoring 17 goals so far this season...i wonder where Juve would be if it wasnt for those goals, who else would have scored that many if we didnt have trez...iaquinta? palladino?....Trez comes up when we need him, he is smarter in the box than Amauri. That is something a team needs, someone that can read the game from inside the box because not everyone can win games with goals from outside the 18 yard box. Dont sell trez, buy a classy CAM that can feed the balls to him, no use spending money on another striker, they cant do everything themselves, we need someone that can put the ball right at our strikers feet, they will do the rest....
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
I will be disappointed if we give up on Nocerino already. I believe he will be great in the future.

I wonder if that fact that we are willing to sacrafice Nocerino means that the Flamini deal will happen?


I agree...who will replace Zanetti in a couple years? UNLESS we do get flamini but regardless, i hate giving up on our youth products especially when there is so much hype surrounding them.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
I just don't see how you can write off a 23 year old after his first season with us.
dude i completely agree with you. especially how many times our "tinkerman" changes the lineups. Unless your trez, del, nedved, camo, buffon, now sissoko...nothing is really guaranteed. Maybe nocerino needs a "role model" meaning someone to model his game off of perhaps. someone to learn from. (just a thought, no one bash me please) :xfinger:
 

Joaco

the cronopio
Dec 11, 2005
5,213
dude i completely agree with you. especially how many times our "tinkerman" changes the lineups. Unless your trez, del, nedved, camo, buffon, now sissoko...nothing is really guaranteed. Maybe nocerino needs a "role model" meaning someone to model his game off of perhaps. someone to learn from. (just a thought, no one bash me please) :xfinger:
I know you are new but try to reduce your 3 post in 1. It's really annoying when people do double (triple, in your case) post.

Welcome to the forums,anyway :tup:
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
i wouldnt exactly call marchioni and nocerino prospects
Marchionni isnt, Noce might be,but i was referring to Marchisio, Giovinco and De Ceglie
I didnt want this deal to happen, if we were to sacrifice any of them,
i wanted to point out that money wasnt the only issue fixed, in this certain offer.
We havent signed him yet, the Noce+Marchio deal seems very tempting, i mostly agree with that, we dont need Noce and Marchio, we already found their replacements for free and the allocation of 10-15 mil from our funds for this deal will, still allow us to make some proper transfers in places, where we really hurt.
The way i see it, this deal was too difficult to happen mostly because the incompetence of Secco and money wasnt the only factor that would fvck us up.
Surprisingly Secco came up with the best offer of his carrier, i m not sure if this offer is real, its too good to be true, it may be fabricated by a reporter's mind,
or Moggi really helps/advices Secco.
Such a deal that respect all of my parameters,(in money + material) seems to good to be true, therefore i am afraid it wont happen, if any of the parameters change in a later deal (For EX Noce and De Ceglie + Criscito instead of Marchioni + the same cash)
i would still consider this deal too bad for Juve's interests!
 
Aug 27, 2007
28
Personally i believe Amauri is not a bad player, but i do not really believe he is a neccessity, as compared to our other sectors of weakness i.e certain defensive and midfield positions, such as CAM for sure. Im not sure that losing out on Palladino and other future prospects to bring in another striker (seeing as Alex and Trez are top class, and we already have Iaquinta as back up) is worth it at all. Especially as everyone knows we are lacking in other departments. I would rather save and splurge on a good CAM and/or LB personally.
And what would happen if Trezeguet and Del Piero got injured? Who would play? Iaquinta and Palladino? I don't see Palladino as a prospect to the future. He mau have technical abbilities but he hasn't got the goalscoring abbility. I think that we need a striker, midfielder, and a few defenders. We should get Amauri, swap Tiago for Maxi, get Flamini and maybe Kewell on free, and with Mellberg comming in june we should get a left and right defender.
 

BIG DADDY!!!

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2004
5,302
Juve To Again Offer Giovinco In Amauri Deal?

According to the Gazzetta dello Sport, Juventus could once again offer Sebastian Giovinco to Palermo as part of the deal to sign Amauri.

Juve To Again Offer Giovinco In Amauri Deal?

Juve are desperate to complete the signing of the Brazilian striker, however Palermo are demanding €25m, and are only willing to do business if this price is made up in a player-plus-cash exchange.

Yesterday it was reported that Bianconeri sporting director Alessio Secco had agreed with his Palermo counterpart Rino Foschi to sign Amauri for €10.5m plus Antonio Nocerino and Marco Marchionni.

However it is believed that Marchionni is unsure whether he wants to make the move to Sicily, while Nocerino is demanding a transfer to either Fiorentina or hometown club Napoli.

It now seems that negotiations are back to square one, and as a result Secco could go back to his original proposal.

It is speculated that the transfer director had originally agreed to sign Amauri for €15m plus young starlets Sebastian Giovinco, Paolo De Ceglie and Claudio Marchisio.

Claudio Ranieri then vetoed this deal at the last minute, but Secco would like to offer Giovinco again as he tries to complete what is becoming something of a transfer saga.

Anthony Sormani

:wallbang: I dont know what to believe!!
 

Zaim

Senior Member
Dec 1, 2007
1,307
Somebody at the club would surely put a halt to this if Secco really plans to do this. Moggi would personally knock some sense in Secco if this is true. But I'm not believing all this. These rumours really look like anti-Secco propaganda. He can't be this bad at what he does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 23)