Alessandro Matri (39 Viewers)

Bezzy

The Bookie Queen
Jun 5, 2010
20,827
So, still based on nothing at all, right?

Giving faith to players is fine with me. But that is basically what happened with Vuci-Gio. Not a big success from what I remember.
not they haven't
they haven't played 3 games in a row together
and they have everytime different (useless) wingbacks. supportering them?
why play with wingbacks who need to cross if we have no one in the area to cross too. :(
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Buck Fuddy

Lara Chedraoui fanboy
May 22, 2009
10,883
Matri is shit in everything, so what do you know?
Touché.


not they haven't
they haven't played 3 games in a row together
and they have everytime different (useless) wingbacks. supportering them?
why play with wingbacks who need to cross if we have no one in the area to cross too. :(
Shall we use the useless or different wingbacks excuse for Matri as well?

Someone in the area to cross to, you say? I can come up with 2 names here. Neither of them Gio or Vucinic.


You prefer a certain combo up front, that's fine. I merely pointed out that it's based on nothing at all. In fact, you could argue that it has already been proven as (somewhat) underwhelming.
 
Jul 20, 2012
20,044
When we played a 4-3-3, and pepe was on the wing, we had good crosses and Matri has very good movement. That is already better then Bendtner, why dont we switch back? Work with what we have dont try to create something
 

Bezzy

The Bookie Queen
Jun 5, 2010
20,827
Touché.




Shall we use the useless or different wingbacks excuse for Matri as well?

Someone in the area to cross to, you say? I can come up with 2 names here. Neither of them Gio or Vucinic.


You prefer a certain combo up front, that's fine. I merely pointed out that it's based on nothing at all. In fact, you could argue that it has already been proven as (somewhat) underwhelming.
our wingbacks except de ceglie can't put a decent cross in.

- - - Updated - - -

Quag should play IMO.
quag and vuci :agree:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 24)