Not really...
For me at least, both Rolex and Omega are much bigger names than Hublot. And the mechanic envolved in making one is more accurate and precise.
Rolex deserves its price for what the watch contains so does Omega but not Hublot.
true, that's a good point, why are hublots so expensive, but then, why are watches such as jaeger lecoultre, cartier or patek phillipe so expensive, do they justify their price?
i happen to love omega's personally, i've had 3 omega's and one rolex, and i can say that i actually liked the omegas more, and in terms of performance and quality, omegas are in no way inferior to rolex despite rolex's being almsot 3 times the price (submariner compared to seamaster)
i know people who have bought a rolex to jsut show off or to show their 'status', i don't think that's cool