In stalins case, he was the whole leader of a nation and had already out the law of factionalism that no group could ever rise if so then they would be either exiled or put in jail.. this is different israel doesnt own all of palestine.. just yet.. although what it is doing is setting up divides and at the same time sending its bulldozers across and taking over peoples land whenever it feels necessary. Also during the times when stalin was around there wasnt enough internation presence anywhere thus other international countries never really knew about the hidden matters and couldnt find out due to communist regime. However in this case there is every reason a people can find out but they either dont, or when they do they just give israel a warning and thats all we hear of the end of it.
The british in india case was remarkably different too.. the british spent more emphasis on gaining materials and income out of the land that they colonised and as a result suppress there culture on the indians rather than spending a lot of time killing the native indians that lived in their country.. as a result it was all about money. People like indra gandhi, brought a better understanding amongst the british and his native indians which helped the british to give the independence to india during 1947 thanks to the indian national congress which was set up to talk only. This clearly shows that the british were willing to actually listen to the indians unlike now. Israel is not willingly to listen to palestinians they have breached more ceasefires more agreements than the opposite they are also known to be breaching many UN resolution and as a result aint nowhere as a democratic country as its allys the U.S and most especially U.K. I have already shown in my previous posts how they were the first to have breached the oslo agreement.
The british in india case was remarkably different too.. the british spent more emphasis on gaining materials and income out of the land that they colonised and as a result suppress there culture on the indians rather than spending a lot of time killing the native indians that lived in their country.. as a result it was all about money. People like indra gandhi, brought a better understanding amongst the british and his native indians which helped the british to give the independence to india during 1947 thanks to the indian national congress which was set up to talk only. This clearly shows that the british were willing to actually listen to the indians unlike now. Israel is not willingly to listen to palestinians they have breached more ceasefires more agreements than the opposite they are also known to be breaching many UN resolution and as a result aint nowhere as a democratic country as its allys the U.S and most especially U.K. I have already shown in my previous posts how they were the first to have breached the oslo agreement.
Buy on AliExpress.com
