Search results

Is that a butterfly tattoo on Di Natale's right shoulder?

Don't they all start the same way?

Actually, I did not mention a word about how insulting were some comments about what I stand for were until it was mentioned how insulting were the religion bashing was.

Yes I read that you accused me of hypocricy for not defending religion.

I am not religious but I don't insult religion nor religious people and at the same time I don't have to defend them. Where is the hypocricy in that? You don't seem to defend gays, does that make you a hypocrite?

What I find strange that with all the insults gay people were thrown at, none of us that defended the gays reacted to that until religion came into the discussion and the relgious freaks started barking. Even more strange was that we were accused of insulting religion, all of us.

Now where did I say that? You jump gun to call me a hypocrite. Get your facts straight first.

Come again? How can it be not accurate if he is expressing his own interpretation of certain statements? For example, I find it insulting to say: I'd rather be raised by two dogs than by a gay couple. It is degenerating. And surprise, it has been said in this thread.

So what about gay abortion, are you with or against it?

No, I am just saying but it is obvious that Andy's intentions are provocation.

Well, Ze Tahir did. He said that Muslim kids show unmatched love and respect to their parents and elderly.

And this should bring an end to this thread and throw the religious freaks out.

I did not expect you admit you were wrong even if you deep down know how ignorant was what you said. The honour is not likewise.

You're the only one going in circles. Check out my signature to remember what you said. You better go out of here as you contribute to nothing in this discussion.

You are beating around the bush. The whole thing started by you saying that if sex is only for pleasure, children will no longer be born. Do you realize that this statement was out of your ass, ignorant, and above all WRONG? If you don't realize it yet then you need to get yourself checked...

It commonly happens where you live but it not always the case like you just said. And IVF, which you claim you already know it, is another reason to prove what you said WRONG, in that of humans have sex ONLY for pleasure, no more children will be born.

No one talked about need though. You brought it up again because you are failing in your argument. People can have sex SOLELY for pleasure and children will still be born. End of fucking discussion, you have been proven wrong multiple of times in this discussion.

I am not to interfere with your uncle's story but when you say denial I would assume he was denying it only because of the environment, right?

Have you heard of this, Klin? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IVF I don't think you have.

This there is generalization at its best.