Gay Adoption (8 Viewers)

[Salvo]

I think it would be a denial because let's face it, I don't think anyone want's to be gay. His environment definately was a factor. Conservative catholic mother, little Italian town.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Klin]

No, it is not only used for lesbians. Many heterosexual pairs use this method to create children.

And that was a reply to your extinction problem if sex is only done for pleasure.

Heterosexual couples use that when there are problems with either the male's sperm or female's egg. It's not something all heterosexuals need to do to have children.

 

[JCK]

Heterosexual couples use that when there are problems with either the male's sperm or female's egg. It's not something all heterosexuals need to do to have children.

No one talked about need though. You brought it up again because you are failing in your argument.

People can have sex SOLELY for pleasure and children will still be born. End of fucking discussion, you have been proven wrong multiple of times in this discussion.

 

[Klin]

It is not a realisation, it is an awakening from denial.

That does not make it OK, Salv. It's nature after all.

This there is generalization at its best.

It is whatever you want to call it. It commonly happens here.

Sounds like you're speaking from experience, Klin. What's the matter, hubby dumped ya?

Isn't there some weather forecast program going on right now?

This is the story of my uncle, bar the marriage. Denial, not realisation.

I didn't want to get your uncle story going on here, but , call it what you want, it's still not OK to deny it if it is just nature.

Have you heard of this, Klin?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IVF


I don't think you have.

Yes I have.

 

[Zlatan]

Only old testament man

Good that the author fixed it in the second edition, perhaps due to the poor reception among the targeted audience. Probably had a good publisher that suggested it.

 

[Zlatan]

Well that depends on the Christianity you follow or dogma you choose to follow. As I have said I believe in solo scriptura and the greatest commandment Jesus gave is " LOVE THE LORD YOU GOD WITH ALL YOUR MIGHT, AND LOVE THEY NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF " believe it or not I do that first and foremost. I read his words and that is my Christianity, not that which is made if man.

So if you have a gay neighbour who wants to adopt, but cant, while you can and believe that he shouldnt, you are not loving him as yourself? Because you obviously want the possibility for yourself to adopt (maybe not specifically but as a rule), while not him.

 

[JCK]

It is whatever you want to call it. It commonly happens here.

Yes I have.

It commonly happens where you live but it not always the case like you just said.

And IVF, which you claim you already know it, is another reason to prove what you said WRONG, in that of humans have sex ONLY for pleasure, no more children will be born.

 

[Klin]

No one talked about need though. You brought it up again because you are failing in your argument.

People can have sex SOLELY for pleasure and children will still be born. End of fucking discussion, you have been proven wrong multiple of times in this discussion.

If that's what you think, fine. I'm not here to convince you, or any others for the matter.

They'll still be born, because they're doing sex the natural way. That's why sometimes contraceptives are used. Last time I checked, anal sex or a strap on won't impregnate you.

 

[Salvo]

Denial happens because of one's environment, the constraints that society places on someone. Regardless of whether it is nature or not. Homosexuality is nature, society's expectations turn into a sin.

 

[JCK]

If that's what you think, fine. I'm not here to convince you, or any others for the matter.

They'll still be born, because they're doing sex the natural way. That's why sometimes contraceptives are used. Last time I checked, anal sex or a strap on won't impregnate you.

You are beating around the bush. The whole thing started by you saying that if sex is only for pleasure, children will no longer be born.

Do you realize that this statement was out of your ass, ignorant, and above all WRONG? If you don't realize it yet then you need to get yourself checked.

And it is nothing that I THINK, I KNOW that children can be born if sex was only for pleasure. Actually, almost everyone on earth knows it, except you.

 

[Klin]

It commonly happens where you live but it not always the case like you just said.

And IVF, which you claim you already know it, is another reason to prove what you said WRONG, in that of humans have sex ONLY for pleasure, no more children will be born.

We're going around in circles, and I'm bored. Sex would ONLY be for pleasure if there are 6 billion gay people in the world, which is not the case.

Anyway, I'm out of here.

 

[JCK]

We're going around in circles, and I'm bored. Sex would ONLY be for pleasure if there are 6 billion gay people in the world, which is not the case.

Anyway, I'm out of here.

You're the only one going in circles. Check out my signature to remember what you said.

You better go out of here as you contribute to nothing in this discussion.

 

[Alen]

In the end, does it really matter if it's natural or something done by choice?


Has anyone here been in love? Deeply in love? Love was not explained scientifically (was it?) as far as I know and my guess is that being human, homosexuals fall in love the same way heterosexuals do. Why would we even try to "cure" a girl that is madly in love with another girl, prepared to do everything for her, just as me or you were capable of doing when we were in love with a girl? Is there a cure at all?
Personally I wouldn't like to watch two guys doing it. The solution for me is easy - do not watch guys doing it. If anyone does it in public, the same should be done as with hetero couples - fine them.
Gay couples are no danger for the human race. With sperm banks and everything, even if we all turn gay one day, we will still have men to provide the sperm and women to carry a baby. Just let these people be. They don't present a danger for you, as much as you find the image of them doing it disturbing.

 

[Klin]

You're the only one going in circles. Check out my signature to remember what you said.

You better go out of here as you contribute to nothing in this discussion.

Did not expect any different reaction from you, honestly.

Thank you for the honor though.

 

[JCK]

Did not expect any different reaction from you, honestly.

Thank you for the honor though.

I did not expect you admit you were wrong even if you deep down know how ignorant was what you said. The honour is not likewise.

 

[JCK]

In the end, does it really matter if it's natural or something done by choice?


Has anyone here been in love? Deeply in love? Love was not explained scientifically (was it?) as far as I know and my guess is that being human, homosexuals fall in love the same way heterosexuals do. Why would we even try to "cure" a girl that is madly in love with another girl, prepared to do everything for her, just as me or you were capable of doing when we were in love with a girl? Is there a cure at all?
Personally I wouldn't like to watch two guys doing it. The solution for me is easy - do not watch guys doing it. If anyone does it in public, the same should be done as with hetero couples - fine them.
Gay couples are no danger for the human race. With sperm banks and everything, even if we all turn gay one day, we will still have men to provide the sperm and women to carry a baby. Just let these people be. They don't present a danger for you, as much as you find the image of them doing it disturbing.

And this should bring an end to this thread and throw the religious freaks out.

 

[Salvo]

In the end, does it really matter if it's natural or something done by choice?


Has anyone here been in love? Deeply in love? Love was not explained scientifically (was it?) as far as I know and my guess is that being human, homosexuals fall in love the same way heterosexuals do. Why would we even try to "cure" a girl that is madly in love with another girl, prepared to do everything for her, just as me or you were capable of doing when we were in love with a girl? Is there a cure at all?
Personally I wouldn't like to watch two guys doing it. The solution for me is easy - do not watch guys doing it. If anyone does it in public, the same should be done as with hetero couples - fine them.
Gay couples are no danger for the human race. With sperm banks and everything, even if we all turn gay one day, we will still have men to provide the sperm and women to carry a baby. Just let these people be. They don't present a danger for you, as much as you find the image of them doing it disturbing.

 

[Alen]

And we might be a self-destructive animal, but we are still the smartest animal, by far. One of our kind might wipe out half the population with an atom bomb, but we surely won't allow an extinction of our kind by natural causes.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Alen, JCK and Salvo

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Muhammed sucked little boys off daily. You know why? Because you couldn't prove otherwise.

Muhammed was a white dude from Brooklyn. You know why? Because you couldn't prove otherwise.

Muhammed was an absolute faggot, just like Allah. You know why? Because you couldn't prove otherwise.

Jesus sucked Muhammed's dick while he pissed Jesus juice. You know why? Because you couldn't prove otherwise.

Muhammed sucked the dick of anybody who made a cartoon of him sucking off another man's dick. You know why? Because you couldn't prove otherwise.

The Scripture or retarded Koran deserves to be shat upon. You know why? Because you couldn't prove otherwise.

Todd and Timmy fucked Allah in the ass, came in his butt, and ejeculated/shat Morocco. You know why? Because YOU CAN'T PROVE OTHERWISE.