Search results

Are we pretending the club also wouldn't like to have him back sooner?

Another QUALITY CB needs to come, not Milenković, if Rugani leaves. I am still hopeful they intend to spend big money by the end of this window and they used the USA tour to evaluate the squad and used this time to zero in on targets. Big signings were planned before the sale of De Ligt...

In fact they had an agreement with him for this summer on a fee transfer. Juventus took him earlier

There's no talking football with people who think a player playing deeper is a negative and having worse raw stats automatically means he is a worse player. Pjanić had 3 best years of his career with Max Also funny that this narrative about Allegri ruining everything he touches comes from the...

I didn't say they have no credit but you are talking about two different things here. You said there is no excitement for Fagioli because the club has not shown they can develop youth players which is not true. Then you went on to RM selling players and buying them back as some sort of proof...

Smart ones do

It can be done if you drill the players like Conte does. Allegri wants different things, wants players to think and adapt

3 weeks out, Ake 2 months

The only guy that stayed and developed there was Vazquez. He spent one year on loan and stayed with Zidane. Others were all sold first and bought back after developing elsewhere

No, you said the club does not develop good talents, but there is nothing to develop if there aren't any. No big club other than maybe Barca focuses on this. They spend money on other club's talents mostly and if they have a generational one in their ranks they develop him, just as Juve did...

Then it's a bullshit argument. Good players develop elsewhere, you cannot just use a blanket statement and pretend Paro, Giovinco, De Ceglie, Palladino etc. were good enough but the club failed to develop them. You don't make a pie out of shit. Reality is the club never emphasized youth...

OK then please give me the names of our young players we failed to develop that became great elsewhere?

This club has a very good history of developing talents that were good enough. I would like to hear the names of all these talents that were ready and the club ruined instead please.

If Rovella and Fagioli were so ready even last season and improved over the course of it and people obviously believe in them so much (me included), why all this drama that the team is bad if we have two young players that are so ready they could've played here last season? Shouldn't there be...

Because he tries to play like Drogba in a body of Ronaldo at best. Against RM I noticed he didn't try once to separate himself from Militao, he always went body to body and ofc Militao has the advantage that way. Did the same thing vs Skriniar last season. Meanwhile Benzema was always a step...

Every first half these 3 games was very good/excellent. Problems start in the second when kids and reserves of reserves come on. On paper the starting 11 looks really good. Depth is the problem. Let's see what they do until the end of the window.

Scrubs lol They have 500m worth of players on the pitch now

He can also get ass raped by Vinicius just as easily. Danilo did make a mistake on the penalty (situation in which he should not have been in at all), but in the open field dealt really well with Vini. Zakaria good defensively, but we really didn't hold the ball up well to give him and Fagioli...