Search results

They'd sit back and let the Lega and EPL deal with them in my opinion

Wishful thinking. The odds of UEFA or FIFA getting involved are slim to nil. The only way I see it is if Inter falls off the map competitively and therefore little sacrifice is made on their part. Even still though, you are asking them to take action against Inter while ignoring Milan’s...

Would Udinese? or Genoa? They would be the types of teams to take Inter's place. Juve and Milan should qualify (usually) anyway. Besides, this thing would impact Milan too since they too were found violating article 6 and no one is touching Berlumerda's toy at UEFA.

FFP is gradual and benefits large groups of fans/teams. This would benefit one lower ranking Serie A team and its fans who would take Inter's place and eliminate Inter who have a large fan base. Not the same.

Never. It fell out of statute. The only possible thing that can happen is that Auricchio names them in his eventual trial but who knows if that will even happen at this point. From a sporting perspective Inter won't stand trial for any of this. The 5 year mark came and went.

Nothing new yet other than Casoria fixing the next date for October 25th pushing the verdict to mid November at a minimum.

Nothing. They aren't on trial.

They won't do anything if it costs them money. They could step in if Inter were no longer a factor in Europe but so long as they qualify and people tune in to watch them they will compromise nothing. Football is a business.

I hope it's tomorrow. He's annoying.

The comment section of calciomercato is full of interisti making claims that this call firmly proves that the Moggi system existed. Hahahahahaha I wonder if their parents are proud of them.

B. Are you getting ready for the game? R. Yes yes yes… B. Did you see anything while you were resting? R. No I’ve seen almost nothing… B. But listen… He suffered a lot to get to where you are… to come back, so I’m expecting, believe me, that you make no mistake...

The revelation is simple. Moggi's "man on the inside" according to the prosecutors was always Bergamo (not even Pairetto) and here he is clearly fucking Moggi. There goes their man on the inside theory (essential for the cupola). There goes the theory that Inter made similar requests but...

likely

Here's the killer call in its entirety by the way. Telefonata Bergamo-Arbitro Pasquale Rodomonti DD.5205 ore 17.24 28-11-2004 B. Stai preparando bene la partita? R. Sì, sì, sì… B. Hai visto qualcosa oggi mentre ti riposavi? R. No, ho visto quasi niente… B. Però...

Nothing will happen. Closing arguments, maybe more revelations of what we all already know but the decisions are still a month or so away so don't expect the earth to shake just yet.

I see what you are saying but I think we were arguing two different points. It initially sounded as though you were saying the Moggi system was proven in the FIGCs release which is why I started to explain otherwise. The truth is that the FIGC is just conveniently reluctant to admit that it...

Start in Milan

It's article 6 alright. It is a deliberate attempt to interfere with the impartiality of the referee. Tying it back to Inter might be an issue though. That is Bergamo's violation and Carraro's as well since he gave similar advice to Bergamo. If they can link a Facchetti/Moratti discussion to...

I read this, in fact I posted it here. Don't be tricked by their ability to spin shit into gold. The fact that other teams were discovered killed the exclusivity claim that founded the initial sentence. They can't say that though for one simple reason. They had (mere weeks before) announced that...

I'm not sure what you misunderstood but no, their guilt wasn't reaffirmed. Juventus were found to have violated article 1 for maintaining near exclusive rapports with the designators. The FIGC release proved that all clubs were doing that making the exclusive theory irrelevant and went a step...